# Isolation and Purification of Bacterially Produced Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Mechanisms, Limitations, and Current Advances

**Authors:** Ľubomíra Jurečková, Daniela Chmelová, Miroslav Ondrejovič, Stanislav Miertuš

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/life16020269 · Life · 2026-02-04

## TL;DR

This review discusses methods to isolate and purify PHAs, biodegradable plastics made by bacteria, focusing on improving cost and sustainability.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive review of current methods and limitations in isolating PHAs, emphasizing sustainable and economically viable approaches.

## Key findings

- Traditional halogenated solvents are commonly used but less environmentally friendly.
- Pretreatment steps significantly influence extraction efficiency and polymer purity.
- Combining different extraction strategies can enhance PHA recovery and material properties.

## Abstract

Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are microbial polyesters that belong to a group of bioplastics with the potential to replace petroleum-derived plastics. Their main drawback is the high production cost, which puts them at a disadvantage compared to conventional plastics. A significant part of these costs arises from the isolation of PHAs from the cellular biomass of producing microorganisms. This review summarizes the main approaches used to recover both scl- and mcl-PHAs from native or dried (lyophilized) biomass, with attention to physical, chemical, and biological methods. Key parameters influencing extraction efficiency, polymer purity, and the final material properties are discussed, including pretreatment steps that often determine the overall outcome. The review also compares traditional halogenated solvent extraction with more environmentally acceptable alternatives and considers how different strategies can be combined to improve recovery. The current literature highlights the need for sustainable and economically acceptable processes that would make large-scale PHA production more feasible.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** EMIM (MESH:D020268), injury to (MESH:D014947), DEP (MESH:D007015), toxicity (MESH:D064420)
- **Chemicals:** SDS (MESH:D012967), isopropanol (MESH:D019840), acetic acid (MESH:D019342), HCl (MESH:D006851), alkanes (MESH:D000473), glycolipids (MESH:D006017), ammonium laurate (MESH:C030358), NaOH (MESH:D012972), volatile organic compounds (MESH:D055549), Ethanol (MESH:D000431), DMP (MESH:C007477), polyethylene (MESH:D020959), ethyl propionate (MESH:C069373), sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate (MESH:D004143), MEK (MESH:C005222), Amides (MESH:D000577), benzene (MESH:D001554), water (MESH:D014867), phospholipid (MESH:D010743), DEP (MESH:C034789), heptane (MESH:D006536), PHB (MESH:C000720856), MIBK (MESH:C005458), (EMIM) diethyl phosphate (MESH:C543070), Brij 58 (MESH:D002592), EDTA (MESH:D004492), 2-MTHF (MESH:C550584), PHBHHx (MESH:C115940), Methylene chloride (MESH:D008752), EC (MESH:C031133), IGEPAL CA-630 (MESH:C010615), polysaccharides (MESH:D011134), Cyclohexanone (MESH:C036468), carbon (MESH:D002244), Chlorinated hydrocarbons (MESH:D006843), Polymers (MESH:D011108), Organic esters (MESH:D004952), Triton X-100 (MESH:D017830), HClO (MESH:D006997), Ketones (MESH:D007659), methanol (MESH:D000432), NaCl (MESH:D012965), sodium ethoxide (MESH:C098088), potassium dodecyl sulfate (MESH:C028913), 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (MESH:C015530), N-hexane (MESH:C026385), acids (MESH:D000143), P (MESH:D010758), salt (MESH:D012492), Alcohol (MESH:D000438), LiCl (MESH:D018021), KCl (MESH:D011189), pentane (MESH:C033353), Tween 20 (MESH:D011136), H2SO4 (MESH:C033158), poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate (MESH:C088151), 1,2-dichloroethane (MESH:C024565), ether (MESH:D004986), gamma-butyrolactone (MESH:D015107), DMSO (MESH:D004121)
- **Species:** Aeromonas hydrophila (species) [taxon 644], Delftia acidovorans (species) [taxon 80866], Acanthopagrus latus (yellowfin seabream, species) [taxon 8177], Comamonas sp. (species) [taxon 34028], Haloferax (genus) [taxon 2251], Priestia megaterium (species) [taxon 1404], Halomonas sp. (species) [taxon 1486246], Bacillus sp. (in: firmicutes) (species) [taxon 1409], Burkholderia cepacia (species) [taxon 292], Halomonas bluephagenesis (species) [taxon 2778948], Priestia flexa (species) [taxon 86664], Rhodospirillum rubrum (species) [taxon 1085], Haloferax mediterranei (species) [taxon 2252], Bacillus australimaris (species) [taxon 1326968], Burkholderia sp. (species) [taxon 36773], Rhodovulum sulfidophilum (species) [taxon 35806], Halomonas alkalicola (species) [taxon 1930622], Bacillus cereus (species) [taxon 1396], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Tenebrio molitor (yellow mealworm, species) [taxon 7067], Synechocystis sp. (species) [taxon 1143], Halomonas halophila (species) [taxon 29573], Pseudomonas sp. PH-a (species) [taxon 1170662], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Rattus norvegicus (brown rat, species) [taxon 10116], Tequatrovirus T4 (species) [taxon 10665], Halomonas hydrothermalis [taxon 115561], Cupriavidus necator (species) [taxon 106590], Pseudomonas sp. (species) [taxon 306], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Methylobacterium sp. (species) [taxon 409], Azohydromonas lata (species) [taxon 45677], Paraburkholderia sacchari (species) [taxon 159450], Pseudomonas putida (species) [taxon 303]
- **Cell lines:** NPCM — Sus scrofa (Pig), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_V146)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942554/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942554/full.md

## References

140 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942554/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942554