# Interest of the Robotic Approach for Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients in a Setting of Limited Robotic Platform Access: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison with Open Surgery

**Authors:** Edouard Wasielewski, Antoine Castel, Hector Prudhomme, Kevin Preault, Salaheddine Abdennebi, Marie Livin, Aude Merdrignac, Fabien Robin, Laurent Sulpice

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm15041520 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2026-02-14

## TL;DR

Robotic surgery for pancreatic cancer is safe for elderly patients, with outcomes similar to open surgery and younger robotic patients.

## Contribution

Demonstrates the safety of robotic pancreatic surgery in elderly patients in settings with limited robotic access.

## Key findings

- Age ≥75 was not linked to higher major complications or 90-day mortality in robotic surgery.
- Robotic and open surgery had similar major morbidity in elderly patients.
- Robotic surgery had lower 30-day readmission rates despite more delayed gastric emptying.

## Abstract

Background: With population aging and the increasing incidence of pancreatic and periampullary malignancies, more elderly patients are being considered for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Although robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is steadily adopted, evidence regarding its safety in patients aged ≥ 75 years remains limited, particularly in centers with restricted access to robotic platforms. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including patients who underwent PD between January 2019 and September 2025. Outcomes after RPD were compared between patients aged < 75 and ≥75 years. In addition, elderly patients undergoing RPD were compared with elderly patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) using 1:2 propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was major postoperative morbidity (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ III). Results: Among 525 PDs, 130 (25%) were performed robotically, including 29 patients aged ≥ 75 years. Within the RPD cohort, age ≥ 75 years was not associated with an increased risk of major complications compared with younger patients (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.23–1.76; p = 0.45), nor with higher 90-day mortality. In the propensity score-matched elderly cohort, major morbidity was similar between RPD and OPD (10% vs. 7%; p = 0.68). RPD was associated with a significantly lower 30-day readmission rate, despite a higher incidence of delayed gastric emptying, mainly driven by mild (grade A) cases. Conclusions: RPD appears to be safe in carefully selected patients aged ≥ 75 years, with morbidity and mortality comparable to those observed in younger RPD patients and in elderly patients undergoing open surgery. These findings support the selective use of RPD in elderly patients, even in centers with limited access to robotic platforms.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** pancreatic cancer (MONDO:0005192)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** DGE (MESH:D013272), acinar cell carcinoma (MESH:D018267), PPH (MESH:D006470), Cholangiocarcinoma (MESH:D018281), pancreatic and periampullary lesions (MESH:D010182), Neuroendocrine tumor (MESH:D018358), POPF (MESH:D010185), CCA (MESH:C536211), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (MESH:D021441), injury to (MESH:D014947), hypertension (MESH:D006973), malnutrition (MESH:D044342), OPD (MESH:D005597), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MESH:D010190), postoperative complications (MESH:D011183), postoperative pain (MESH:D010149), ampullary tumors (MESH:D009369), duodenal adenocarcinoma (MESH:D000230), IPMN (MESH:D000077779)
- **Chemicals:** alcohol (MESH:D000438)
- **Species:** Nicotiana tabacum (American tobacco, species) [taxon 4097], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942455/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942455/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942455/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942455