Effects of Calcium Carbide Slag Incorporation on the Multiscale Performance of Sulfoaluminate Cement Mortars
Jianqing Tang, Liaojun Zhang, Su Lu, Jiaxin Liu, Shuo Wang, Shasha Li, Jing Li, Zhongying Li

TL;DR
Adding calcium carbide slag to sulfoaluminate cement improves strength and durability by altering the material's microstructure and reducing ion permeability.
Contribution
The study identifies 9% calcium carbide slag as the optimal dosage for enhancing SAC mortar performance through microstructural and electrochemical improvements.
Findings
9% CCS increased compressive strength by 6.53% and reduced drying shrinkage by 22.47% at 28 days.
CCS reduced chloride ion permeability, with electrical flux and diffusion coefficient decreasing by 39.98% and 28.89%, respectively.
CCS promotes denser hydration products and limits moisture migration, improving the internal pore structure.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of calcium carbide slag (CCS) (0–12 wt%) incorporation on the workability, electrochemical properties, durability, and microstructure evolution of sulfoaluminate cement (SAC) mortar. Results showed that increasing CCS content reduced mortar fluidity and shortened setting time, indicating that CCS accelerates early hydration. A 9% CCS content was determined to be the optimal dosage; at 28 days, compared to the control group, this dosage group exhibited a 6.53% increase in compressive strength, a 22.47% decrease in drying shrinkage, and a 0.279% decrease in mass loss. These performance improvements stemmed from CCS’s ability to inhibit pore connectivity and limit moisture migration. Electrochemical analysis further revealed that the 9% CCS dosage group had the highest charge transfer resistance and resistivity (30.00% higher than the control group),…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConcrete and Cement Materials Research · Smart Materials for Construction · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
