Implementation of an Intraoperative Augmented Reality Environment for Custom-Made Partial Pelvis Replacements—A Proof of Concept and Initial Results
Yannik Hanusrichter, Carsten Gebert, Sven Frieler, Marcel Dudda, Arne Streitbuerger, Jendrik Hardes, Lee Jeys, Martin Wessling

TL;DR
This study shows that using augmented reality during surgery for custom-made pelvis replacements can improve accuracy, though it increases stress for the surgical team.
Contribution
The first intraoperative use of AR for custom partial pelvis replacements in revision arthroplasty is demonstrated.
Findings
AR enabled implantation in all 11 cases with a mean COR deviation of 4.2 mm.
The cup plane deviation angle averaged 4.4°, and the implant superimposition scored 0.69 (Dice-Score).
AR improved intraoperative feedback but increased stress for the surgical team.
Abstract
Background: The use of augmented reality (AR) in orthopaedics is growing rapidly but is mainly limited to pre-operative planning and teaching. This study is one of the first to describe the intraoperative application within revision arthroplasty for the positioning of customised partial pelvic replacements. Methods: In a proof-of-concept study an AR environment was used during surgery in 11 cases to enhance implant positioning. Postoperatively, a voxel-based CT deviation analysis was carried out to determine the COR deviation and the cup plane deviation angle. Additionally, digital implant superimposition was conducted. Results: Implantation was possible in all cases with a mean COR deviation vector of 4.2 (SD 2.5; 1.2–9.3) mm and a cup plane deviation angle of 4.4 (SD 2.5; 0.7–8.1)°. The implant analysis showed a superimposition of 0.69 (SD 0.15; 0.38–0.88) (Dice-Score calculation).…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSurgical Simulation and Training · Augmented Reality Applications · Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
