Pilot-Scale Evaluation of Flat-Sheet Membrane Bioreactor for In Situ Retrofitting Textile Dyeing Wastewater Treatment Plant

TL;DR

This study evaluates two membranes for upgrading a textile dyeing wastewater treatment plant, finding that one performs better under high loads.

Contribution

The study provides a pilot-scale evaluation of PVDF and PES flat-sheet membranes for retrofitting textile dyeing wastewater treatment.

Findings

Both PVDF and PES membranes achieved similar effluent quality and rejection performance.

PVDF membrane showed better anti-fouling capability during high-load stages.

PVDF is recommended for retrofitting with a sustainable flux below 18 L/(m2·h).

Abstract

It is promising to in situ retrofit the activated sludge process with a membrane bioreactor (MBR) to increase treatment capacity and improve effluent quality in a textile dyeing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Membrane selection among commercial products for real engineering applications is critical for this specific wastewater, and little information is available in the literature. This study systematically evaluated the application potential of two flat-sheet microfiltration membranes made of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and polyether sulfone (PES) in pilot-scale MBRs for in situ retrofitting textile dyeing WWTP. During the four stages with different loads, both membranes achieved nearly the same effluent quality and rejection performance. Both membranes showed little trans-membrane pressure (TMP) increase at an average flux of 15 L/(m2·h) with sub-critical flux characteristics, and showed a sharp TMP increase with super-critical flux characteristics observed at an average flux of 18/22.5 L/(m2·h). After 74 d of filtration, at an average sludge concentration of 12,000 g/L, the PVDF membrane showed less variation in pore size distribution and bubble point pressure, while the PES membrane showed less change in permeability and contact angle. Both membranes met general MBR requirements due to the minimizing pristine effects of both membranes by this specific wastewater matrix. The PVDF membrane showed better anti-fouling capability, especially during high-/over-load stages, and thus was suggested for MBR retrofit, with a sustainable membrane flux below 18 L/(m2·h).

Figures