# Quality of Life Among Patients with Nasal Obstruction—Does Etiology Matter?

## TL;DR

This study finds that nasal obstruction significantly affects quality of life, regardless of its cause, with rhinologic symptoms being the most burdensome.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that quality of life is similarly impaired across different nasal obstruction etiologies, challenging assumptions about etiology-specific impacts.

## Key findings

- No significant differences in quality of life scores were found between different nasal obstruction etiologies.
- Rhinologic symptoms had the highest burden across all patients.
- Patients with rhinitis had higher scores for rhinologic and ear/facial symptoms compared to those with anatomical obstruction.

## Abstract

Objectives: Nasal obstruction is a common presenting symptom in otolaryngology practice. Frequent etiologies include allergic and non-allergic rhinitis, inferior turbinate hypertrophy (HIT), and nasal septal deviation (DNS). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between major causes of nasal obstruction and their effect on patient-reported quality of life (QoL). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients presenting with nasal obstruction who completed the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale, and a visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were categorized into three groups based on etiology: rhinitis, anatomical obstruction, or combined pathology. Results: The study included 170 patients (62% male), with a mean age of 38.4 years. Mean SNOT-22, NOSE, and VAS scores were 38, 61, and 6.5, respectively, with no statistically significant differences observed among the three etiologic groups. QoL outcomes were also comparable across anatomical subgroups, including isolated DNS, HIT, or combined findings. Among SNOT-22 domains, rhinologic symptoms demonstrated the highest burden. Patients with rhinitis exhibited significantly higher rhinologic and ear/facial symptom scores compared with patients with isolated anatomical obstruction (p = 0.04 and p = 0.005, respectively). Strong correlations were observed between SNOT-22, NOSE, and VAS scores across the entire cohort. Conclusions: Nasal obstruction is associated with substantial impairment in multiple domains of quality of life, independent of the underlying etiology. These findings highlight the broad impact of nasal obstruction on patient well-being. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further assess changes in quality of life following medical and surgical interventions.