Gastric-Type Cervical Adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathologic Features, Molecular Landscape, and Therapeutic Challenges

TL;DR

Gastric-type cervical adenocarcinoma is an aggressive, HPV-independent cancer with distinct molecular features and poor outcomes, requiring new diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Contribution

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the clinicopathologic, molecular, and therapeutic aspects of gastric-type cervical adenocarcinoma.

Findings

Gastric-type cervical adenocarcinoma is associated with worse survival and advanced-stage diagnosis compared to HPV-related subtypes.

Molecular alterations in TP53, CDKN2A, and other genes are common in gastric-type cervical adenocarcinoma.

Precision therapies targeting HER2/HER3, PD-1/PD-L1, and claudin 18.2 show promise for selected patients.

Abstract

Endocervical adenocarcinoma is now classified within an etiologic framework based on the presence or absence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GAS) is the prototypical HPV-independent subtype, accounting for up to 25% of endocervical adenocarcinomas and showing a particularly high frequency in East Asia. GAS is typically diagnosed at a more advanced stage than usual-type HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA); exhibits deep stromal and parametrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and a strong propensity for ovarian and peritoneal metastasis; and is associated with markedly worse survival, even in stage I disease. Radiological evaluation is challenging because of diffuse infiltrative growth, prominent mucin production, and frequent underestimation of extra-cervical spread. Histologically, GAS shows gastric-type (pyloric) differentiation, ranging from minimal deviation adenocarcinoma to poorly differentiated forms, and often overlaps with precursor lesions such as atypical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia and gastric-type adenocarcinoma in situ. Immunophenotypically, GAS is typically p16-negative, ER/PR-negative, and frequently exhibits mutant-type p53 and expression of gastric markers including MUC6, HIK1083, and claudin 18.2. Recent next-generation sequencing and multi-omics studies have revealed recurrent alterations in TP53, CDKN2A, STK11, KRAS, ARID1A, KMT2D, and homologous recombination-related genes, together with the activation of PI3K/AKT, WNT/β-catenin, TGF-β, and EMT pathways and characteristic metabolic reprogramming. GAS is highly resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and its current management follows guidelines for squamous and usual-type adenocarcinoma. Emerging data support precision-medicine approaches targeting HER2/HER3, PD-1/PD-L1, and claudin 18.2, and suggest a role for PARP inhibition and other genotype-directed therapies in selected subsets. Given its aggressive biology and rising relative incidence in the HPV-vaccination era, GAS represents a critical unmet need in gynecologic oncology. Future progress hinges on developing reliable diagnostic biomarkers, refining imaging protocols, and validating targeted therapies through international clinical trials.

Figures