# Improving the Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis: Leveraging Radiomics and Dosiomics Within IDLSS Lung Subregions

## TL;DR

This study improves the prediction of radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients by combining radiomics and dosiomics data from specific lung subregions.

## Contribution

The novel use of IDLSS-defined lung subregions with dosiomics and radiomics features enhances RP prediction beyond traditional methods.

## Key findings

- Dosiomics features outperformed DVH features in predicting radiation pneumonitis.
- Combining radiomics and dosiomics achieved high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.91).
- Applying SMOTE improved sensitivity without reducing specificity in model training.

## Abstract

Purpose: This study develops a predictive model for radiation pneumonitis (RP) risk in lung cancer patients after volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) that leverages high-dimensional dosiomics and dose–volume histogram (DVH) features within IDLSS (incremental-dose interval-based lung subregion) lung subregions. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 136 lung cancer patients treated with VMAT between 2015 and 2022, including 39 patients who developed RP greater than Grade 2. Using the IDLSS method, seven regions of interest (ROIs), including the Planning Target Volume (PTV), normal lung, and five subdivided lung areas, were delineated on pretreatment Computed Tomography (CT) images. DVH, radiomics, and dosiomics features were extracted from these ROIs and organized into nine distinct feature sets. A comprehensive pipeline was applied, integrating IDLSS-defined lung subregions, high-dimensional dosiomics features, LASSO-based feature selection, and SMOTE oversampling to address class imbalance in the training data. Logistic regression, random forest, and feedforward neural networks were constructed and optimized via tenfold cross-validation. Model performance across different feature sets was evaluated via the average AUC, F1 score, and other performance metrics. Results: LASSO regression revealed that BMI and volume within the 5–10 Gy and 10–20 Gy lung subregions were significant predictors of RP. The performance evaluation demonstrated that the dosiomics features consistently outperformed the DVH features across the models. Combining radiomics and dosiomics achieved the highest predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.91, ACC = 0.89, NPV = 0.95, PPV = 0.78, F1 score = 0.82, sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.90). Applying SMOTE during training significantly improved sensitivity without compromising specificity, confirming the value of balancing strategies in enhancing model performance. Incorporating all the features together did not provide additional performance gains. Conclusions: Integrating radiomics and dosiomics features extracted from IDLSS-defined lung subregions significantly enhances the ability to predict RP after VMAT, surpassing traditional DVH metrics. The substantial contribution of dosiomics features highlights the importance of spatial dose heterogeneity in RP risk assessment.