# Is Clinical Remission, an Ambitious Treatment Goal, Achievable in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Asthma on Inhaled Therapies: How Ambitious Should We Be?

## TL;DR

This study evaluates whether clinical remission is achievable in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe asthma using inhaled therapies.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence on clinical remission attainability in Japanese asthma patients using three different guideline definitions.

## Key findings

- 34–59% of Japanese patients met clinical remission criteria at Week 24 using Workgroup definitions.
- CR achievement varied based on definitions and thresholds used across treatment arms.
- 33–60% of patients achieved CR at Week 52 in a long-term safety study.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Clinical remission (CR) is an ambitious and attainable treatment goal for asthma; however, CR definitions vary. Evidence of CR in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe asthma on inhaled therapies is lacking and was evaluated based on three guideline definitions: the United States Workgroup consensus statement, Japanese Guidelines for adult asthma (JGL), and Practical Guidelines for Asthma Management (PGAM). Methods: Post hoc analysis of Phase III studies including Japanese participants: Japanese subpopulation of CAPTAIN (NCT02924688) and a 52-week Japanese long-term safety study (NCT03184987). CAPTAIN randomized participants to once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) regimens ± umeclidinium (UMEC). The long-term safety study allocated participants to once-daily FF/UMEC/VI based on asthma control status. All three CR definitions assessed systemic corticosteroid use, severe exacerbations, and asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 <1.5 [Workgroup] or ≤0.75 [JGL/PGAM]); Workgroup and JGL also assessed lung function (change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s of ≥0 [stabilized] or ≥100 mL [optimized]). Results: CR attainability varied on definition and thresholds used. At Week 24 in the CAPTAIN Japanese subpopulation, 34–59% and 18–45% of participants (Workgroup; stabilized and optimized), and 21–34% and 8–24% (JGL; stabilized and optimized) met CR criteria across treatment arms. At Week 52 in the long-term safety study, equivalent figures for CR achievement were 33–60%, 22–45%, 11–28%, and 11–23%. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates that CR, using different definitions and criteria, is an attainable treatment goal with inhaled therapy in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe asthma not yet eligible for biologics.