# Sex-Related Differences in Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Aortic Valve Replacement with Perceval Sutureless Valve

**Authors:** Ali Aljalloud, Yusuf Shieba, Rashad Zayat, Ajay Moza, Ahmed Farghal Ahmed Mohammed

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcdd13020071 · Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease · 2026-01-31

## TL;DR

Women are more likely to experience prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement with the Perceval sutureless valve, even with similar hemodynamic performance.

## Contribution

This study identifies sex-related differences in prosthesis-patient mismatch rates and suggests tailored strategies for improved outcomes in female patients.

## Key findings

- PPM was significantly more frequent in women (74.6%) compared to men (22.1%).
- Women had lower indexed effective orifice areas and higher LV ejection fractions postoperatively.
- Early clinical outcomes were comparable between sexes despite higher PPM rates in women.

## Abstract

(1) Background: Prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) impairs left ventricular (LV) recovery and is more common in women due to smaller aortic dimensions. Although the Perceval sutureless valve provides larger effective orifice areas, sex-specific PPM outcomes remain unclear. This study evaluated sex-related differences in PPM incidence, severity, and early impact after Perceval AVR. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 139 patients (68 males, 71 females) who underwent Perceval AVR between 2016 and 2020. PPM was defined per Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria using indexed effective orifice area (EOAi) and stratified by body-mass-index (BMI) (<30 vs. ≥30 kg/m2). Echocardiography assessed hemodynamic performance. (3) Results: PPM was markedly more frequent in women than men (74.6% vs. 22.1%, p < 0.001). Among non-obese patients, 47.9% of females versus 16.2% of males developed PPM (p < 0.001). Women received smaller valves and consistently exhibited lower EOAi despite similar gradients. Postoperatively, females had reduced EOAi (0.8 vs. 0.9 cm2/m2, p < 0.001) but higher LV ejection fraction (55.8% vs. 49.5%, p = 0.004). Early clinical outcomes were comparable between sexes. (4) Conclusions: Despite favorable hemodynamics of sutureless AVR, anatomical sex differences result in persistently higher PPM rates in women, predominantly of moderate severity. Tailored strategies—including aortic root enlargement and sex-specific EOAi thresholds—may improve prosthesis selection and outcomes in female patients.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** AS (MESH:D001024), obese (MESH:D009765), stroke (MESH:D020521), COPD (MESH:D029424), diabetes mellitus (MESH:D003920), valve (MESH:D006349), chronic kidney disease (MESH:D051436), PPM (MESH:C536928), injury to (MESH:D014947), PVL (MESH:D003763), endocarditis (MESH:D004696), heart failure (MESH:D006333), peripheral artery disease (MESH:D058729), AI (MESH:D001022), atrial fibrillation (MESH:D001281), CKD (MESH:D012080), AR (MESH:D013734), paravalvular leak (MESH:D019559), LV hypertrophy (MESH:D017379)
- **Species:** Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941163/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941163/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941163/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941163