# Effectiveness of nurse-run smoking cessation discussions lasting up to 90 minutes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Klas Winell, Juha E. Ahonen

PMC · DOI: 10.18332/tpc/215042 · Tobacco Prevention & Cessation · 2026-02-21

## TL;DR

A review of nurse-led smoking cessation sessions up to 90 minutes found no significant effectiveness in helping people quit smoking.

## Contribution

This study is the first to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-run smoking cessation counseling with a maximum of 90 minutes of contact.

## Key findings

- Nurse-led smoking cessation counseling up to 90 minutes did not show significant effectiveness in promoting smoking cessation.
- There was substantial heterogeneity across studies, indicating variability in results.
- The study suggests that smokers may benefit more from medication and group counseling rather than short nurse-led sessions.

## Abstract

It is important that nurses are active in smoking cessation. We studied if cessation discussions by nurses, lasting up to 90 minutes, lead to cessation of smoking.

A literature search was made from The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and MEDLINE. Randomized controlled trials on smoking cessation of adult daily smokers by nurses published from January 1983 to December 2023 were searched with the following defining of intervention: at least once face-to-face contact, a maximum of five contacts, total counselling time of ≤90 minutes, no concurrent cessation medication or physician input. Controls had no nurse counselling. The restricted maximum-likelihood method was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) without adjustment for individual trials and to estimate the pooled effect. RoB 2 tool was used to assess the bias.

Seven studies involving 4443 smokers were included. All studies presented some risk of bias, and three were judged to have high overall risk of bias. The pooled analyses favored the controls but without a statistically significant effect at 12 months, biochemically validated abstinence (4295 smokers, six studies, OR=1.22; 95% CI: 0.83–1.80) and self-reported abstinence (3396 smokers, five studies, OR=1.02; 95% CI: 0.65–1.61). Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I2=57% for biochemically validated outcomes; I2=73% for self-reported outcomes).

Our results of studies on nurse-run counselling lasting ≤90 minutes did not demonstrate effectiveness in promoting smoking cessation. This should be considered while organizing cessation care. Instead, smokers who are interested in using cessation medication should be given more time and offered the possibility to participate in cessation group counselling. Given that many participants in the included studies had long smoking histories and smoking-related illnesses, future RCTs should examine nurse-run cessation interventions in populations with shorter smoking histories and fewer comorbidities.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** type 2 diabetes (MESH:D003924), heart disease (MESH:D006331), chronic disease (MESH:D002908), axial spondylo-arthritis (MESH:D001168), smoker (MESH:C000719328), hypertension (MESH:D006973), death (MESH:D003643), atrial fibrillation (MESH:D001281), Smoking (MESH:D015208), disease (MESH:D004194), diabetes (MESH:D003920)
- **Chemicals:** cotinine (MESH:D003367), nicotine (MESH:D009538), Carbon monoxide (MESH:D002248)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Nicotiana tabacum (American tobacco, species) [taxon 4097]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941095/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941095/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941095/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941095