# Impact of Ostomy on Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

**Authors:** Cristina Díaz-Sánchez, Pedro Manuel Rodríguez-Muñoz, Víctor Navarro-López, Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres, Alba Sánchez-Gil, Juan Luis Sánchez-González, Cristina Rivera-Picón

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14040444 · Healthcare · 2026-02-10

## TL;DR

Ostomy surgery in colorectal cancer patients significantly lowers their quality of life, requiring better psychosocial support.

## Contribution

This study provides a robust meta-analysis confirming the consistent negative impact of ostomy on quality of life across different study designs.

## Key findings

- Ostomized patients have a pooled effect size of −0.29 lower quality of life compared to non-ostomized patients.
- The negative impact of ostomy is consistent across study designs and follow-up periods.
- Psychosocial and emotional challenges significantly contribute to reduced quality of life in ostomized patients.

## Abstract

What are the main findings?
Ostomized patients with colorectal cancer have significantly lower quality of life compared to non-ostomized patients (pooled effect size = −0.29).The negative impact of ostomy is consistent across study designs and follow-up periods, confirming the robustness of the findings.

Ostomized patients with colorectal cancer have significantly lower quality of life compared to non-ostomized patients (pooled effect size = −0.29).

The negative impact of ostomy is consistent across study designs and follow-up periods, confirming the robustness of the findings.

What are the implications of the main findings?
Healthcare professionals should provide tailored psychosocial and rehabilitative support to improve adaptation and emotional well-being in ostomized patients.Future research should explore targeted interventions to enhance social reintegration and long-term quality of life in this population.

Healthcare professionals should provide tailored psychosocial and rehabilitative support to improve adaptation and emotional well-being in ostomized patients.

Future research should explore targeted interventions to enhance social reintegration and long-term quality of life in this population.

Background/Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the impact of ostomy on quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer, synthesizing evidence from case–control and interventional studies, and to assess the consistency, robustness, and clinical implications of the findings. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published up to 21 September 2025. Eligibility criteria encompassed cases–control studies comparing ostomized versus non-ostomized colorectal cancer patients and interventional studies assessing quality of life before and after ostomy creation. Data extraction included study design, population characteristics, quality of life outcomes, and main findings. Results: A total of 5841 records were identified, with 71 full-text articles assessed and six studies meeting inclusion criteria. The random-effects meta-analysis using the REML estimator yielded a pooled effect size of −0.29 (95% CI: −0.38 to −0.20; p < 0.001), indicating significantly lower quality of life in ostomized patients. No heterogeneity was observed (τ2 = 0; I2 = 7%). Quality assessment indicated that 66.7% of studies were high quality and 33.3% intermediate. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, as exclusion of influential studies did not alter results. Conclusions: Ostomy significantly reduces quality of life in colorectal cancer patients. Psychosocial and emotional challenges, including body image concerns and social limitations, contribute to this impact. These findings emphasize the need for comprehensive care and targeted interventions to enhance adaptation, social reintegration, and overall well-being in ostomized patients.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** colorectal cancer (MONDO:0005575)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** death (MESH:D003643), CRC (MESH:D015179), stage IV disease (MESH:D007676), depression (MESH:D003866), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (MESH:D015212), cognitive difficulties (MESH:D003072), gastrointestinal symptoms (MESH:D012817), Comorbidity (MESH:D004194), injury to (MESH:D014947), pain (MESH:D010146), skin irritation (MESH:D012871), impairments (MESH:D060825), psychiatric (MESH:D001523), Cancer (MESH:D009369), body image distress (MESH:D057215), sexual dysfunction (MESH:D012735), anxiety (MESH:D001007), rectal cancer (MESH:D012004), fatigue (MESH:D005221), emotional distress (MESH:D012128)
- **Chemicals:** mCOH (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941021/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941021/full.md

## References

47 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941021/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12941021