# Dynamic Cervical Myelopathy Misleading on Neutral Imaging: The Role of Flexion–Extension MRI

## TL;DR

This paper describes a case where dynamic MRI revealed a cervical spinal cord issue not visible on standard imaging, leading to effective surgical treatment.

## Contribution

The paper highlights the importance of flexion–extension MRI in diagnosing dynamic cervical myelopathy and guiding surgical decisions.

## Key findings

- Flexion MRI identified spinal cord contact with an osteophyte not visible on neutral imaging.
- Surgical fusion improved symptoms and neurological stability.
- Adjacent-segment disease emerged post-surgery, requiring additional intervention.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) may result from posture-dependent spinal cord compromise not detectable on neutral imaging. Dynamic MRI can uncover clinically relevant mechanisms underlying otherwise unexplained myelopathy and guide management. This report illustrates a dynamic cervical myelopathy phenotype revealed by flexion–extension imaging and its impact on surgical decision-making. Methods: A 49-year-old man presented with progressive bilateral upper-limb paresthesias, intrinsic hand atrophy, and distal weakness. Neutral cervical MRI, standard radiographs, and flexion–extension MRI were performed to investigate a suspected dynamic etiology, including differentiation from Hirayama disease. Surgical treatment consisted of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), with clinical and radiological follow-up. Results: Neutral MRI showed intramedullary T2 hyperintensity from C4 to C6 without static canal stenosis or frank compression, while radiographs demonstrated segmental kyphosis without instability. Flexion MRI revealed reproducible spinal cord contact with a small cranially located osteophyte at C5–C6, concordant with the myelopathic signal. ACDF at C4–C6 led to clinical improvement. One year later, recurrent symptoms from adjacent-segment pathology (C3–C4 myelopathic signal and C6–C7 foraminal disc herniation) required a second ACDF, resulting in durable neurological stability. Conclusions: This case demonstrates flexion-dependent cord–osteophyte conflict causing cervical myelomalacia in the absence of static stenosis. Dynamic MRI resolved a clinical–radiological mismatch and directly informed surgical planning. Recognition of dynamic myelopathy phenotypes and vigilance for adjacent-segment disease after fusion are essential for optimizing outcomes.