Correction: Flora and fauna: how nonhuman species interact with natural and man-made EMF at ecosystem levels and public policy recommendations
B. Blake Levitt, Henry C. Lai, Albert M. Manville, Theodora Scarato
Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects · Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies · Insects and Parasite Interactions
An incorrect word was used in the section Part 1. Introduction: historical background*, Ecosystem perspective and low-intensity exposures*, paragraph 2.
The paragraph read:
“In its natural state, very little radiofrequency radiation (RFR) reaches the Earth's surface. Aside from the Earth's natural extremely low frequency (ELF) direct current (DC) static magnetic fields and the Schumann Resonances, lightening and sunlight would primarily comprise our ecological exposures to the electromagnetic spectrum.”
The corrected paragraph reads:
“In its natural state, very little radiofrequency radiation (RFR) reaches the Earth's surface. Aside from the Earth's natural extremely low frequency (ELF) direct current (DC) static magnetic fields and the Schumann Resonances, lightning and sunlight would primarily comprise our ecological exposures to the electromagnetic spectrum.”
An incorrect unit was used in the section Part 2. Addressing radiation impacts to wildlife: policy ramifications, Science-based policy, paragraph 4.
The phrase read “SAR: 0.003 W/kg (3 μW/kg);”.
The corrected phrase reads “SAR: 0.003 W/kg (3 mW/kg);”
The original version of this article has been updated.