# Clinicogenomic Insights for Progression-Free Survival in Prostate Cancer

**Authors:** Kelvin Ofori-Minta, Bofei Wang, Jonathon E. Mohl, Abhijit Mandal, Ming-Ying Leung

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ijerph23020256 · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2026-02-18

## TL;DR

This study combines clinical and genomic data to better predict prostate cancer progression risks, helping guide targeted treatment and monitoring.

## Contribution

The novel integration of clinicogenomic data improves progression-free survival modeling and identifies key clinical and genomic predictors.

## Key findings

- Survival models achieved high accuracy in ranking prostate cancer patients by progression risk.
- Clinical variables like treatment history and tumor recurrence were consistently important predictors.
- Genomic data, particularly the gene MYH6, provided additional insights into progression risks.

## Abstract

Public health relevance—How does this work relate to a public health issue?
Prostate cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies among men worldwide, with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden, driven by heterogeneous disease progression patterns.This study leverages survival analysis models to identify patient profiles at elevated risk of prostate cancer progression, aiming to generate hypotheses for investigation that can support more targeted clinical intervention and patient monitoring.

Prostate cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies among men worldwide, with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden, driven by heterogeneous disease progression patterns.

This study leverages survival analysis models to identify patient profiles at elevated risk of prostate cancer progression, aiming to generate hypotheses for investigation that can support more targeted clinical intervention and patient monitoring.

Public health significance—Why is this work of significance to public health?
This work revealed insights into prostate cancer by showing that key clinical factors remain primary drivers of progression risks, while genomic factors provide additional information on disease progression and potential biological mechanisms.This combined clinicogenomics perspective supports biologically informed risk stratification and facilitates hypothesis generation.

This work revealed insights into prostate cancer by showing that key clinical factors remain primary drivers of progression risks, while genomic factors provide additional information on disease progression and potential biological mechanisms.

This combined clinicogenomics perspective supports biologically informed risk stratification and facilitates hypothesis generation.

Public health implications—What are the key implications or messages for practitioners, policy makers, and/or researchers in public health?
Progression-free survival models can be used to help distinguish patients at higher risk of cancer progression from those with more stable conditions, potentially reducing overtreatment and focusing resources where they are most needed.The findings highlight the value of integrating genomic and clinical data for prostate cancer evaluation and monitoring, which offers a foundation for assessing progression risks, thereby enabling biologically informed cohort-level disease risk assessment and stratification.

Progression-free survival models can be used to help distinguish patients at higher risk of cancer progression from those with more stable conditions, potentially reducing overtreatment and focusing resources where they are most needed.

The findings highlight the value of integrating genomic and clinical data for prostate cancer evaluation and monitoring, which offers a foundation for assessing progression risks, thereby enabling biologically informed cohort-level disease risk assessment and stratification.

Prostate cancer (PrCa), the second most common cancer diagnosed in men globally, remains a critical challenge in precision oncology. While PrCa can be deadly, it is highly treatable if detected early. Identifying associative factors influencing disease progression risks can help inform preliminary steps that will further the expedition of clinical therapeutic intervention decisions, which will improve treatment outcomes. While conventional PrCa progression assessment tools rely heavily on a few clinical parameters, the importance of genomic information is increasingly recognized. In this study, we evaluate the prognostic value of patients’ clinicogenomic profiles in modeling progression-free survival (PFS) of PrCa. Three survival models, namely the penalized Cox model, random survival forest, and a deep learning survival neural network, were deployed with extensive tuning applied to a dataset for a cohort of 494 patients with PrCa. This dataset, compiled from public data in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) accessed via cBioPortal, consists of relevant clinical features and single-nucleotide variant information on likely PrCa-related genes. The survival models demonstrated satisfactory discriminatory performance, with Harrell’s concordance index ranging from approximately 0.80 to 0.87 on held-out test data, indicating their ability to rank patients according to their relative progression risk among patients, while exhibiting distinct dynamics, all three models consistently identified clinical variables that indicated neoadjuvant treatment history, neoplasm cancer status, and tumor recurrence as well as the gene MYH6 as important predictor variables for PrCa PFS. Our findings suggest the incorporation of genomic data into the survival modeling workflow, thereby allowing the use of integrated clinicogenomics information to gain insights into progression risks for patients with PrCa.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** SPTA1 (spectrin alpha, erythrocytic 1) [NCBI Gene 6708] {aka EL2, HPP, HS3, SPH3, SPTA}, CHD4 (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 4) [NCBI Gene 1108] {aka CHD-4, Mi-2b, Mi2-BETA, SIHIWES}, NKX3-1 (NK3 homeobox 1) [NCBI Gene 4824] {aka BAPX2, NKX3, NKX3.1, NKX3A}, TRRAP (transformation/transcription domain associated protein) [NCBI Gene 8295] {aka DEDDFA, DFNA75, PAF350/400, PAF400, STAF40, TR-AP}, CSMD3 (CUB and Sushi multiple domains 3) [NCBI Gene 114788], KLK3 (kallikrein related peptidase 3) [NCBI Gene 354] {aka APS, KLK2A1, PSA, hK3}, CHD5 (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5) [NCBI Gene 26038] {aka CHD-5, PMNDS}, IDH1 (isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP(+)) 1) [NCBI Gene 3417] {aka HEL-216, HEL-S-26, IDCD, IDH, IDP, IDPC}, MCM3 (minichromosome maintenance complex component 3) [NCBI Gene 4172] {aka HCC5, P1-MCM3, P1.h, RLFB}, CTNNB1 (catenin beta 1) [NCBI Gene 1499] {aka CTNNB, EVR7, MRD19, NEDSDV, armadillo}, HERC2 (HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2) [NCBI Gene 8924] {aka D15F37S1, MRT38, SHEP1, jdf2, p528}, SALL1 (spalt like transcription factor 1) [NCBI Gene 6299] {aka HEL-S-89, HSAL1, Sal-1, TBS, ZNF794}, PCSK7 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 7) [NCBI Gene 9159] {aka LPC, PC7, PC8, SPC7}, TTN (titin) [NCBI Gene 7273] {aka CMD1G, CMH9, CMPD4, CMYO5, CMYP5, EOMFC}, HERC1 (HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase family member 1) [NCBI Gene 8925] {aka MDFPMR, p532, p619}, BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) [NCBI Gene 673] {aka B-RAF1, B-raf, BRAF-1, BRAF1, NS7, RAFB1}, SMAD4 (SMAD family member 4) [NCBI Gene 4089] {aka DPC4, JIP, MADH4, MYHRS}, KMT2D (lysine methyltransferase 2D) [NCBI Gene 8085] {aka AAD10, ALR, BCAHH, CAGL114, KABUK1, KMS}, EPHB1 (EPH receptor B1) [NCBI Gene 2047] {aka ELK, EPHT2, Hek6, NET}, TP53 (tumor protein p53) [NCBI Gene 7157] {aka BCC7, BMFS5, LFS1, P53, TRP53}, PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) [NCBI Gene 5728] {aka 10q23del, BZS, CWS1, DEC, GLM2, MHAM}, PCA3 (prostate cancer associated 3) [NCBI Gene 50652] {aka DD3, NCRNA00019, PCAT3, PRUNE2-AS1}, RYBP (RING1 and YY1 binding protein) [NCBI Gene 23429] {aka AAP1, APAP-1, DEDAF, YEAF1}, RREB1 (ras responsive element binding protein 1) [NCBI Gene 6239] {aka FINB, HNT, LZ321, RREB-1, Zep-1}, LRP1B (LDL receptor related protein 1B) [NCBI Gene 53353] {aka LRP-1B, LRP-DIT, LRPDIT}, KMT2C (lysine methyltransferase 2C) [NCBI Gene 58508] {aka HALR, KLEFS2, MLL3}, VWF (von Willebrand factor) [NCBI Gene 7450] {aka F8VWF, VWD}, MYH6 (myosin heavy chain 6) [NCBI Gene 4624] {aka ASD3, CMD1EE, CMH14, MYHC, MYHCA, SSS3}, SPOP (speckle type BTB/POZ protein) [NCBI Gene 8405] {aka BTBD32, NEDMACE, NEDMIDF, NSDVS1, NSDVS2, TEF2}, FAT3 (FAT atypical cadherin 3) [NCBI Gene 120114] {aka CDHF15, CDHR10, hFat3}, ATM (ATM serine/threonine kinase) [NCBI Gene 472] {aka AT1, ATA, ATC, ATD, ATDC, ATE}
- **Diseases:** PCM (MESH:D030401), NTAIT (MESH:D016609), death (MESH:D003643), RSF (MESH:D011475), metastasis (MESH:D009362), hypoxia (MESH:D000860), Cancer (MESH:D009369), PRAD (MESH:D000230), injury to (MESH:D014947), PrCa (MESH:D011471)
- **Chemicals:** SNV (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12940860/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12940860/full.md

## References

48 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12940860/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12940860