# Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale–16™ in Nurses

**Authors:** Eun A. Kim, Hae Ran Kim

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14040424 · Healthcare · 2026-02-08

## TL;DR

This study confirms that the Korean version of the RMRS-16™ is a valid and reliable tool for measuring moral resilience in nurses.

## Contribution

The paper provides validation of the Korean version of the RMRS-16™ for use in South Korean nursing contexts.

## Key findings

- The Korean RMRS-16™ has four factors explaining 56.45% of the variance.
- Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable model fit and supported validity.
- The scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency with Cronbach’s α of 0.86.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale–16™ (RMRS-16™) for nurses. Methods: The RMRS-16™ was translated into Korean using a forward–backward translation process. Data were collected from 417 nurses working in five tertiary and three general hospitals in South Korea. Content validity was assessed using the content validity index. Construct validity was examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Convergent validity was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients with resilience and known-groups validity was examined across burnout levels using analysis of variance and post hoc tests. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α. Results: Exploratory factor analysis identified four factors that explained 56.45% of the cumulative variance: response to moral adversity, relational integrity, personal integrity, and moral efficacy. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated an acceptable model fit (χ2/df = 1.77, standardized root mean square residual = 0.05, root mean square error of approximation = 0.06, goodness-of-fit index = 0.91, comparative fit index = 0.94, Tucker–Lewis index = 0.93), and both convergent and discriminant validity were supported. Moral resilience was positively correlated with resilience and differed significantly by burnout level. The total scale showed satisfactory internal consistency in the full sample (n = 417, Cronbach’s α = 0.86). Conclusions: The RMRS-16™ is a valid and reliable instrument for South Korean hospital practice. It can be used in intervention studies to assess and strengthen moral resilience in nursing practice.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** mental health problems (MESH:D000076082), moral distress (MESH:D013313), injury to (MESH:D014947), critically ill (MESH:D016638), anxiety (MESH:D001007), depression (MESH:D003866), Burnout (MESH:D002055), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Chemicals:** EFA (-)
- **Species:** Meleagris gallopavo (common turkey, species) [taxon 9103], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12940799/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12940799/full.md

## References

43 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12940799/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12940799