Differential Preclinical Efficacy of Combined CDK4/6 and MEK Inhibition in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Based on KRAS/NF1 Mutational Status

TL;DR

This study explores how combining CDK4/6 and MEK inhibitors can be more effective in treating low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, depending on genetic mutations.

Contribution

The study identifies KRAS/NF1 mutational status as a key determinant for treatment response to CDK4/6 and MEK inhibitors in LGSOC.

Findings

Abnormal p16 expression is linked to poorer survival in LGSOC patients.

KRAS/NF1-mutant cell lines show increased sensitivity to trametinib.

Combining palbociclib and trametinib shows synergistic effects in wild-type cell lines.

Abstract

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) usually presents in advanced stages and is associated with a high mortality rate. Clinical trials targeting the MAPK and cell cycle pathways in LGSOC have shown promising results for its treatment, however there is a need to improve efficacy and define predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection for treatment using these agents. We therefore evaluated cell cycle protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 186 LGSOC cases, and evaluated the efficacy of the MEK inhibitor, trametinib, in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, in preclinical models of LGSOC. Abnormal p16 expression was observed in 20% of primary and 46% of recurrent tumors, and it was associated with poorer survival (log-rank p = 0.005). Notably, cell lines with increased sensitivity to trametinib were more likely to harbor mutations in KRAS or NF1 and displayed low pRb levels. Palbociclib showed limited efficacy in vitro; however, the combination of palbociclib and trametinib treatment produced synergistic antiproliferative effects in KRAS/NF1-wild-type cell lines, which displayed higher pRb levels. Acquired drug resistance was linked to increased cyclin D1/E1 expression. This study confirms abnormal p16 IHC as a negative prognostic marker in LGSOC and establishes key determinants of sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapy.

Figures