# Limitations and safety aspects related to the use of bacteriophages in food production

**Authors:** Angelika Roth, Charles M A P Franz, Stefan Hertwig, Thomas Holzhauser, Christian Hertel, Hans-Ulrich Humpf, Karl-Heinz Engel, Uwe Schwarzenbolz, Oliver Schlüter, Henry Jäger, Kemal Aganovic, Volker Heinz

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuag002 · 2026-01-20

## TL;DR

This review discusses the potential and challenges of using bacteriophages as antimicrobial agents in food production, highlighting their benefits, limitations, and safety concerns.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of phage applications, limitations, and regulatory considerations in food production.

## Key findings

- Bacteriophages show promise as natural antimicrobial agents in food safety.
- Their effectiveness and application range are limited, and regulatory classification remains unclear.
- Safety concerns and knowledge gaps require further research.

## Abstract

Bacteriophages are considered to have great potential as naturally occurring, antimicrobial agents for use in food production. Phages are ubiquitous in nature and can be isolated from almost all habitats. This review outlines the possibilities, as well as the limitations of their use in food production. Applications of phages in the food sector are described and the limitations of their use, as well as potential risks, are discussed. Approaches for a possible classification as either processing aid or food additive are considered, and the current status of their use in and outside the EU is presented. Finally, the need for research to close identified knowledge gaps is highlighted.

Bacteriophages can be used as antimicrobial agents and contribute to food safety; however, their range of application and effectiveness are limited, their regulatory classification is not yet conclusively clarified, and certain safety aspects are still debated.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** TLR9 (toll like receptor 9) [NCBI Gene 54106] {aka CD289}, RBP4 (retinol binding protein 4) [NCBI Gene 5950] {aka MCOPCB10, RDCCAS}, NFKB2 (nuclear factor kappa B subunit 2) [NCBI Gene 4791] {aka CVID10, H2TF1, LYT-10, LYT10, NF-kB2, p100}
- **Diseases:** peach tree blight (MESH:D021184), inflammatory (MESH:D007249), mastitis (MESH:D008413), food poisoning (MESH:D005517), salmonellosis (MESH:D012480), bloody diarrhoea (MESH:D003967), EHEC (MESH:D004927), colitis (MESH:D003092), hemolytic uremic syndrome (MESH:D006463), infected (MESH:D007239), died (MESH:D003643), dietary endotoxemia (MESH:D019446), intestinal infections (MESH:D007410), rhinosinusitis (MESH:D000092562), allergic (MESH:D004342), plant (MESH:D010939), Campylobacter infections (MESH:D002169), kidney damage (MESH:D007674), bacterial infection (MESH:D001424)
- **Chemicals:** polyethylene glycol (MESH:D011092), polysaccharides (MESH:D011134), lactic acid (MESH:D019344), alginate (MESH:D000464), salt (MESH:D012492), metal (MESH:D008670), aldehydes (MESH:D000447), xanthan gum (MESH:C002563), ethanol (MESH:D000431), isopropanol (MESH:D019840), biogenic amines (MESH:D001679), drinking water (MESH:D060766), teichoic acids (MESH:D013682), trans-cinnamaldehyde (MESH:C012843), water (MESH:D014867), chlorine (MESH:D002713), tannins (MESH:D013634), peroxides (MESH:D010545), tetracycline (MESH:D013752), gentian violet (MESH:D005840), Gram (-), alcohols (MESH:D000438), LPS (MESH:D008070), lipid (MESH:D008055)
- **Species:** Listeria (genus) [taxon 1637], Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090], Pseudomonas aeruginosa (species) [taxon 287], Yersinia enterocolitica (species) [taxon 630], Escherichia coli O157:H7 (no rank) [taxon 83334], Bacillus cereus (species) [taxon 1396], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Vibrio (genus) [taxon 662], Malus domestica (apple, species) [taxon 3750], Clostridium perfringens (species) [taxon 1502], Brochothrix thermosphacta (species) [taxon 2756], Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (no rank) [taxon 90371], Enterobacterales (order) [taxon 91347], Leuconostoc (genus) [taxon 1243], Cronobacter sakazakii (species) [taxon 28141], Aeromonas hydrophila (species) [taxon 644], Lactococcus lactis (species) [taxon 1358], Campylobacter jejuni (species) [taxon 197], Ovis aries (domestic sheep, species) [taxon 9940], Enterococcus faecalis (species) [taxon 1351], Citrus (genus) [taxon 2706], Salmonella enterica (species) [taxon 28901], Campylobacter coli (species) [taxon 195], Dickeya (genus) [taxon 204037], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Shigella dysenteriae (species) [taxon 622], Rattus norvegicus (brown rat, species) [taxon 10116], Vibrio cholerae (species) [taxon 666], Staphylococcus aureus (species) [taxon 1280], Agrobacterium (genus) [taxon 357], Listeria monocytogenes (species) [taxon 1639], Streptococcus (genus) [taxon 1301], Solanum lycopersicum (tomato, species) [taxon 4081], Streptomyces (genus) [taxon 1883], gut metagenome (species) [taxon 749906], Xylella (genus) [taxon 2370], Bacteriophage sp. (species) [taxon 38018], Gallus gallus (bantam, species) [taxon 9031], Vibrio parahaemolyticus (species) [taxon 670], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Citrobacter freundii (species) [taxon 546], Enterobacteriaceae (enterobacteria, family) [taxon 543]

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12940142/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12940142