Frequency Ranking of Imaging Biomarkers for Lung Cancer Risk Stratification Using a Hybrid Elastic Net Method
Mohamed Jaber, Emmy Stevens, Nezamoddin N. Kachouie

TL;DR
This study shows that a CT scan-based imaging feature called Busyness can better predict lung cancer survival than traditional factors like age and tumor stage.
Contribution
The study introduces Busyness as a novel, noninvasive imaging biomarker for lung cancer prognosis that outperforms conventional clinical variables.
Findings
Busyness, a texture-based imaging feature, outperformed tumor stage, age, and sex in predicting survival outcomes in lung cancer patients.
Stratified analyses confirmed Busyness as a consistent predictor of survival across different age and sex groups.
The use of SMOTE improved model robustness and validated the stability of Busyness as a prognostic biomarker.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of survival in lung cancer remains challenging, as patients with similar clinical characteristics often experience remarkably different outcomes. Traditional prognostic indicators such as tumor stage, age, and sex do not fully reflect underlying tumor aggressiveness. Medical imaging, which is already part of routine clinical care, contains additional quantitative information that can be leveraged to improve risk assessment. In this study, we demonstrate that a texture-based imaging feature, called Busyness, extracted from standard CT scans, serves as a strong indicator of survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. This imaging biomarker consistently distinguishes high- and low-risk patients more effectively than conventional clinical factors across different age and sex groups. These findings suggest that imaging-derived biomarkers can enhance clinical…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis · AI in cancer detection
