# Caries Risk Assessment and Management in Europe: The Multi-Country Observational CARMEN Study

**Authors:** José Frias-Bulhosa, Agnieszka Mielczarek, Nikolai Sharkov, Maria Gaveli, Ana Luísa Costa, Alberto Ogalla, Pierre-Marie Voisin, Sylvain Levet, Jean-Noel Vergnes

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/dj14020126 · 2026-02-23

## TL;DR

A study across four European countries found that dentists use varied methods for caries risk management, with limited use of standardized tools and a link between socioeconomic status and caries risk.

## Contribution

The study highlights the variability in caries risk assessment practices and emphasizes the need for personalized care and biopsychosocial models in dental practice.

## Key findings

- Fewer than 15% of dentists used standardized caries risk assessment tools.
- Caries risk was inversely associated with patients' socioeconomic status.
- University training on caries risk correlated with adherence to recommendations.

## Abstract

Background: This observational ambispective longitudinal international study explored dentists’ practices and patient records concerning dental caries risk management across four European countries (Bulgaria, Greece, Poland and Portugal). Methods: Dentist volunteers recruited patients needing caries risk management, either through preventive or curative measures, from their regular practice. Analyses focused on assessing dentists’ practices in caries risk assessment and management, along with gathering information on patient and dentist characteristics, oral health assessments, and caries risk evaluation. Results: A total of 51 dentists recruited 1008 patients. Across the countries studied, caries risk assessment and management methods varied, with fewer than 15% of dentists using standardized tools. Primary assessment methods included oral examinations and medical interviews, while nutritional and fluoride intake assessments were less common, and salivary or microbiological tests were rare. There was an inverse association between the risk of dental caries and patients’ socioeconomic status. Specific university training on caries risk showed a positive correlation with adherence to recommendations. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the importance of clinicians adapting their approaches to individual patient needs in caries risk assessment and management. However, the wide array of available risk assessment tools presents a challenge, underscoring the necessity of integrating biopsychosocial models into dental practice to effectively deliver personalized care.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** dental caries (MONDO:0005276)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** salivary dysfunction (MESH:D012466), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), CRA (MESH:D003731), periodontal disease (MESH:D010510), pits (MESH:C536528), MID (MESH:D009402), injury to (MESH:D014947), tooth wear (MESH:D057085), dental emergencies (MESH:D004630)
- **Chemicals:** carbohydrates (MESH:D002241), sweetened medications (-), sugar (MESH:D000073893), Fluoride (MESH:D005459)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12939442/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12939442