# Comparative Performance of Haptic Virtual Simulation vs. Conventional Training in Class V Cavity Preparation: A Paired In Vitro Study

**Authors:** Aitor Basterra López, Sebastiana Arroyo Bote, Ángel Arturo López-González, Raúl Cuesta Román, Joan Obrador de Hevia, Pere Riutord-Sbert

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/dj14020109 · 2026-02-13

## TL;DR

This study compares haptic virtual simulation and traditional training for dental cavity preparation, finding that the virtual method is faster and nearly as effective.

## Contribution

The study provides empirical evidence that haptic virtual simulation improves efficiency in dental training without compromising quality.

## Key findings

- Haptic virtual simulation significantly reduced preparation time compared to conventional methods.
- Cavity volumes from virtual simulations were slightly larger but clinically insignificant compared to real preparations.

## Abstract

Background: Haptic virtual simulation (HVS) has emerged as a promising tool in dental education, yet evidence comparing its performance to conventional preclinical training remains limited. Establishing its effectiveness is essential to support its integration into competency-based curricula. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare Class V cavity preparations performed using conventional training on extracted teeth with those performed using a haptic virtual simulator, evaluating preparation time and cavity volume. Methods: Sixty-one extracted human molars were digitized using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to generate corresponding virtual replicas. A calibrated operator prepared 122 standardized Class V cavities (61 real and 61 virtual). The simulator automatically recorded preparation time and cavity volume. For natural teeth, cavity volume was calculated by digital superimposition of pre- and post-operative STL models using Blender. Paired means were compared using Student’s t-test (α = 0.05). Results: Preparation time was significantly shorter when using HVS compared with the conventional method (p < 0.001). Virtual preparations resulted in slightly larger cavity volumes than real preparations, with a statistically significant yet clinically small difference (p = 0.047). Conclusions: Haptic virtual simulation enables more time-efficient Class V cavity preparation while producing cavity volumes comparable to those obtained through conventional training. These findings support the implementation of haptic simulators as a valid and effective complement for preclinical skill acquisition in operative dentistry.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (taxon 9606)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** injury to (MESH:D014947), calculus (MESH:D002137), fatigue (MESH:D005221), cervical defects (MESH:D002575), caries (MESH:D003731)
- **Chemicals:** thymol (MESH:D013943), acrylic (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12939379/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12939379