Generalization of Bandlimited Functions and Applications to Quantum Probability Distributions
Leon Cohen

TL;DR
This paper extends the concept of bandlimited functions beyond Fourier transforms and applies it to quantum probability distributions, deriving bounds on wave functions and their properties.
Contribution
The paper introduces a generalization of bandlimited functions to arbitrary representations and derives new inequalities and bounds for quantum wave functions and probability distributions.
Findings
Explicit bounds on position wave functions and their derivatives are derived for bounded momentum wave functions.
Bounds on momentum wave functions and probability distributions are obtained when position wave functions are bounded.
Probability distribution bounds are derived for wave functions composed of a finite number of energy eigenfunctions.
Abstract
Bandlimited functions are functions whose Fourier transform is confined to a finite band of frequencies. We generalize this concept to representations other than the Fourier transform and show that this leads to a variety of inequalities in arbitrary representations. Several special cases are considered, including frequency, dilation, and the chirplet transform, among others. Examples are given to illustrate each result. We apply the results to quantum mechanical wave functions and probability distributions. For bounded momentum wave functions, we obtain explicit bounds on the position wave function and its derivatives, as well as bounds on the position probability distribution. We also consider the dual problem in which the position wave function is bounded, as in the case of a particle in a box with an arbitrary wave function, and obtain bounds on the corresponding momentum wave…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —Robert A. Welch Foundation
- —Air Force Office of Scientific Research
- —U.S. Department of Energy
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Mathematical functions and polynomials
1. Introduction
Functions that are bandlimited in frequency have played a fundamental role in signal analysis and various aspects of physics and mathematics. By a bandlimited function, one means that its Fourier spectrum is limited to a band of values. In particular, for a function with Fourier transform ,
the function is said to be bandlimited if [1,2,3,4]
in which case, is given by
Bandlimited signals are fundamental in signal processing for numerous reasons. They play a central role in the sampling of the corresponding time function, since one can choose a sampling rate that avoids aliasing and thereby allows exact reconstruction of the time function. They are also central to information transmission and channel capacity. Moreover, they provide an appropriate idealization of real physical signals, since signals encountered in practical systems, such as communication, radar, and sonar, are inherently bandwidth-limited.
Our aim is to generalize the concept of bandlimited functions to representations other than Fourier. In particular, for a self-adjoint operator , we write
where and are the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, respectively. (We consider the continuous case first.) Since is self-adjoint, the eigenvalues are real and the eigenfunctions are complete and orthogonal. Any function, can be expanded as
with
is called the transform of in the basis set [4,5,6,7]. We shall say that the function is bandlimited in the domain if, in that domain,
in which case,
We take the normalization factor to be
In the next section, we present the generalization and then discuss a number of special cases. We subsequently apply the results to the quantum mechanical case, where we obtain bounds on the probability distributions. We consider bandlimited momentum and position wave functions. The discrete case is then treated in general and also applied to the quantum mechanical case of expansions in terms of energy eigenfunctions. In addition, for some of the quantum examples, we consider bump functions, which are functions with compact support that are infinitely differentiable.
Notation
For the generic transform variable, as indicated above, we use , and we denote the size of the finite band by . When we specialize to particular cases, however, we use the standard notation appropriate to each case. For example, in the case of spatial frequency, we use k in place of . In the quantum mechanical cases, we use the conventional notation, such as p for momentum. In addition, for the quantum case, we use L to denote the size of the band; that is, we take .
2. Generalization
We first summarize the main result and give the proof in Section 2.2.
2.1. Summary of Results
For a given bandlimited function , define the function ,
where is an arbitrary real function (which is not, in general, bandlimited). Then
Different cases are obtained by choosing different representations, as exemplified by , and also by choosing different .
Explicitly,
In addition, we define
where is the operator obtained by substituting for in the function . If is real, then is Hermitian. Equation (11) may hence be written as
where
2.2. Proof
Taking the absolute square of both sides of Equation (10), we have [2]
Using the Schwarz inequality in the form
with
and noting that is real, we obtain
Imposing Equation (9), we have
Explicitly,
Equality is achieved for
Operator form. From Equation (4), it follows that [5,6,7,8]
and therefore,
which shows that may be obtained by way of
in which case, Equation (22) may be written as
3. Special Cases of H(λ)
Since is arbitrary, by taking different functions for , one obtains different cases and different inequalities.
3.1. H(λ)=1
For , we have from Equation (14)
and therefore, Equation (11) gives
3.2. H(λ)=λ
Taking
which is equivalent to taking
Equation (11) gives
or
3.3. H(λ)=λn
For ,
we have
or
4. Frequency
The spatial frequency operator, is
This example is the standard case of bandlimited functions, but we use the method presented above to illustrate the general procedure.
For spatial frequency, we use the common notation, k; that is, we take The eigenvalue problem is
and the eigenfunctions normalized to a delta function are
Now,
and applying Equation (30), we have that
The integral gives and therefore [2]
or
For
Equation (33) gives
and therefore,
For the nth power case where
Equation (36) gives
which simplifies to
Amplitude and phase constraints. It is of interest to write the function in terms of its amplitude and phase
in which case,
and
Equations (44) and (47) give
and
where
which is the instantaneous spatial frequency [7,8,9,10,11]. Rewriting Equation (55) as
shows how the instantaneous spatial frequency is constrained.
4.1. Example
Consider the spatial spectrum given by
The function is normalized to one
The spatial function is
Using Equation (44) with , we have
For this case, the spatial function can be calculated exactly
and therefore, we have
4.2. Example: H(k)=e−ak
Consider the case
with a real
Using Equation (14), we obtain that
or
which evaluates to
Notice that the left-hand side depends on x but the right-hand side does not. This inequality holds as long as is a bandlimited function.
4.3. Example: Raised Cosine
Consider the normalized raised cosine function in k space,
The spatial function is
and, per Equations (47) and (50), satisfies
and
For this case, can be calculated exactly
and therefore,
and for the first derivative, we have
5. Quantum Mechanical Case
We specialize to the quantum mechanical case where the momentum wave function is given by [5,6]
Inversely, the position wave function is
One can transform the results of the previous section using ; however, it is instructive to use the momentum operator
and rederive the results. The eigenvalue problem for momentum is
which gives the eigenfunctions
We consider bandlimited momentum wave functions where for
in which case,
We take the normalization factor to be
Consider the position wave function, corresponding to the momentum wave function of , where is an arbitrary real function
Using the Schwarz inequality in the form
with
we obtain
For the case
and noting that
we obtain
or
For the case,
That is,
and for the derivative of the wave function, using Equation (95), we have
What this shows is that if the momentum wave function is bandlimited, then the magnitude of the position wave function is bounded. Moreover, the oscillations of the position wave function, as exemplified by the derivative of the wave function, is also limited in magnitude.
5.1. Example: Constant φ(p) Case
For the normalized constant momentum wave function in the range to ,
Equation (95) gives that
The position wave function can be calculated exactly,
Equation (99) gives
We also have, from Equation (94), that
or
5.2. Example: Truncated Momentum Gaussian Wave Function
We consider the truncated and normalized Gaussian wave function
where
Using Equation (95), we have that the probability of position is bounded
and also all the derivatives of the wave function are bounded by
For this case, the position wave function is calculated to be
and therefore,
We emphasize that one does not have to calculate to know the bounds on it.
5.3. Example: Quantum Raised Cosine in Momentum Space
For the normalized momentum wave function,
That is the probability of position is bounded by
and the derivatives satisfy
The spatial function can be calculated exactly
and hence, the probability distribution is given by
Therefore, we may write Equation (110)
We note that, in the limit ,
and for the singularities at we have
6. Scale/Dilation
The scale or dilatation operator, is defined by [13,14]
which may also be written as
The eigenvalue problem
gives the eigenfunctions [13]
They are normalized so that
Any function defined on the positive x axis may be expanded as
where the scale transform, is given by
A fundamental property of the scale operator is
For the bandlimited case where
Equation (14) gives
For
we obtain that
or explicitly
Equivalently,
For the case,
and for , we have
Explicitly,
Constant D(λ) Case
For the case where
Equation (123) gives that
Additionally,
Using Equation (132), we obtain
7. A=αx−iβddx
Consider the operator
with real and This operator and its associated eigenfunctions are related to coherent states in quantum mechanics [15,16,17] and to the chirplet transform in signal processing [18,19,20]. Solving the eigenvalue problem
gives
where we have normalized to a delta function. Hence, we have the following transform pairs:
For the bandlimited case where
the position function is
Taking
in Equation (14) results in
We list the first few cases of interest. For the for case,
and for , we have
For , we obtain
Constant F(λ) Case
For , we have
which evaluates to
Therefore, Equation (30) (with gives
or
8. Fractional Fourier Transform
In standard notation, the fractional Fourier transform is defined by [21,22,23]
and the inverse by
where
In this formulation, is a parameter, and for different values of , one gets different transforms. In particular, for example, for , one obtains the standard Fourier transform. The kernel of the transformation, satisfies
are the eigenfunctions of the operator where
That is,
This form fits with minor modifications, the general scheme we developed in Section 2 and Section 3.
For a bandlimited , we write
To put this formulation in our notation, we take
We can then write Equation (22) as
In this paper, we just consider the cases where and
For Equation (166) is
giving
now
and furthermore,
Equation (168) then gives
For the case Equation (166) is
Consider
and therefore, we have
However,
and therefore,
9. Discrete Case
For the eigenvalue problem, we write
where and are the discrete eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, respectively. The normalization is
Any function, can be expanded as
with
The set of is analogous to the continuous F defined in Section 1. However, in quantum mechanics, it is customary to use for the expansion coefficients, and therefore, we rewrite Equations (181) and (182) as
with
We define a bandlimited function when
in which case,
The normalization factor is
Consider
where are arbitrary real numbers. Taking
and using the Schwarz inequality for the discrete case
with
we obtain
which gives
or
9.1. hi = 1 Case
For
Equation (195) becomes
or
9.2. Example: Hamiltonian
For a time-independent Hamiltonian, we write the eigenvalue problem as
where and are the discrete energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. The wave function may be expanded as
We define the bandlimited case by taking a finite range of terms
with normalization
Equation (198) gives
Hence,
Example: As an example, consider the case where we have only two terms,
The normalization factor is
Equation (203) gives
Example: Particle in a Box
For a particle in a box where
Equation (207) gives that the probability is bounded by
or
10. The Dual Case
We consider that the quantum mechanical case of a particle is confined to a box of length L. The corresponding momentum wave function is
We obtain bounds on the momentum wave function. We assume that the wave function is normalized to one
Consider now the momentum wave function of where is an arbitrary real function
Taking the absolute square of both sides of Equation (214), we have
Using the Schwarz inequality, we obtain
or
Assuming that is normalized to one, this reduces to
which we rewrite as
Using the definition of as per Equation (214), we have
Special cases. For we have
and
Equation (220) then gives
or
For
and also
Therefore, Equation (220) now gives
or
For the momentum wave function ( ) and its derivative ( ) cases, we have the following bounds respectively.
The probability distribution of momentum is therefore bounded
and the first derivative is bounded by
10.1. Example: Particle in a Box
Consider the following normalized wave function:
Using Equation (224), we have the constraint
The momentum wave function corresponding to Equation (232) can be calculated exactly,
and hence,
10.2. Example: Truncated Gaussian in Box
We consider the normalized truncated Gaussian wave function
The momentum wave function is defined by
which is constrained by
Note that the momentum wave function does not have to be calculated to obtain Equation (239). In this case, it can be
and the exact probability distribution of momentum is
10.3. Quantum Position Bump Function
Bump functions are a function defined on a finite interval where all of its derivatives at the endpoints exist [24]. We consider here the following normalized bump function:
where
The momentum wave function cannot be expressed in a simple closed form. In [25], the asymptotic behavior is considered.
11. Conclusions
We have generalized the concept of bandlimited functions to representations other than the Fourier representation. In general terms, we have shown that if a function is bounded in one domain, then the inequalities we have derived place bounds on the function and its derivatives in the transformed domain. In the quantum mechanical case, these inequalities apply to probability distributions of position and momentum, as well as to derivatives of the wave functions. In particular, for a particle constrained to a finite interval, for example, a particle in a box with an arbitrary wave function, the inequalities show that the momentum probability distribution has an upper bound. While these inequalities provide upper bounds, they are not necessarily the best possible ones.
An important issue concerns the uncertainty principle and bandlimited functions. This is a historical question that goes back to the beginnings of the concept of bandlimited frequency functions. The classical paper on this subject is by Slepian [26]. We are currently investigating this issue in connection with the generalized uncertainty principle, that is, the uncertainty principle for two noncommuting operators.
Of particular interest in the quantum mechanical case are bounds on phase and amplitude. While we have briefly mentioned this issue in Section 4 in connection with instantaneous spatial frequency, we are currently investigating how these approximations behave in relation to our recent work on the relative importance of phase and amplitude [27].
Issues that are currently being investigated include extensions to the three-dimensional case and, more generally, to multidimensional wave functions. Extensions to wave functions with spin, as well as to wave functions with angular momentum, are also under study.
The study of bandlimited wave functions is particularly interesting in quantum mechanics. Generally speaking, for such wave functions, derivatives at the endpoints do not exist. We have introduced, from the field of signal processing, quantum bump wave functions, which are bandlimited functions for which all derivatives do exist at the endpoints. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, these types of wave functions and their possible applications have not been previously studied in quantum mechanics.
One of the referees suggested that the methods developed be applied to the fractional Fourier transform. We have done so briefly in Section 8, but this topic requires considerable further investigation. In addition, one of the referees asked whether the methods developed apply to the Wigner distribution and, by implication, to the general class of quasi-distributions. This is a very interesting question and is currently being investigated.
A natural question is whether the methods can be extended to quantum averages in order to obtain bounds on expectation values. This can be achieved by considering
instead of Equation (86), where we have added an additional arbitrary function . Defining the expectation value of by
we have been able to obtain constraints on . Such constraints are of particular interest in quantum chemistry. In addition, these methods can be applied to reduced density matrices as defined in quantum chemistry, thereby placing bounds on one and two body properties.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Marks R.J.II Handbook of Fourier Analysis & Its Applications Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 2009
- 2Papoulis A. Signal Analysis Mc Graw-Hill Columbus, OH, USA 1977
- 3Franks L. Signal Theory Prentice-Hall, Inc.Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1969
- 4Poularikas A.D. Transforms and Applications Handbook 2nd ed.CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, USA 2010
- 5Bohm D. Quantum Theory Prentice-Hall, Inc.New York, NY, USA 1951
- 6Merzbacher D. Quantum Mechanics John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Hoboken, NJ, USA 1998
- 7Cohen L. Time-Frequency Analysis Prentice-Hall, Inc.Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1995
- 8Cohen L. The Weyl Operator and Its Generalization Birkhäuser Basel, Switzerland 2013
