# Progress in Electrochemical and Fluorescence Sensors for Propyl Gallate Monitoring in Food Samples

## TL;DR

This review discusses recent advances in using electrochemical and fluorescence sensors to detect propyl gallate in food samples.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of material preparation and detection methods for propyl gallate.

## Key findings

- Electrochemical methods offer low cost, high sensitivity, and selectivity for PG detection.
- Fluorescence methods are also promising due to their low cost and fast response.
- Both methods are more practical than traditional chromatographic techniques for PG monitoring.

## Abstract

Recent years have witnessed significant growth in the development of propyl gallate (PG) sensors. PG can be monitored by various approaches, such as electrochemical and fluorescence methods. The electrochemical approaches have several advantages, such as low cost, a benign fabrication process, and high sensitivity and selectivity. Similarly, the fluorescence method has its own advantages, including low cost, high sensitivity, and fast response. Both methods are promising approaches for the monitoring of PG compared to chromatographic methods. In this mini-review article, we review the progress in the preparation of materials for the determination of PG using electrochemical and fluorescence methods. The fabrication of electrodes and the working principle for PG detection are illustrated. The challenges and future perspectives for PG detection are discussed.