# Comparative Analysis of Lysis Buffers for Enhanced Proteomic and Glycoproteomic Profiling

## TL;DR

This study compares lysis buffers for proteomic and glycoproteomic profiling, finding that SDS provides the best coverage and reproducibility.

## Contribution

Demonstrates that SDS lysis buffer outperforms others in proteome and N-glycoproteome depth and reproducibility.

## Key findings

- SDS achieved the deepest proteome and N-glycoproteome coverage in HeLa and HEK293T cells.
- SDS enabled comprehensive extraction from multiple subcellular compartments and glycosylation types.
- SDS showed superior reproducibility with 85% of quantified proteins having coefficients of variation below 5%.

## Abstract

Efficient and reproducible protein extraction is a critical prerequisite for high-quality proteomic and glycoproteomic analyses. In this study, four commonly used lysis buffers, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl), urea (UA), and mammalian protein extraction reagent (MPER), were systematically evaluated within an integrated proteomic and N-glycoproteomic workflow. Using HeLa and HEK293T cells as model systems, we assessed buffer performance in terms of protein and intact N-glycopeptide identification depth, quantitative reproducibility, subcellular coverage, and glycan type distribution. Across both cell lines, SDS consistently achieved the deepest proteome and N-glycoproteome coverage, yielding the highest numbers of identified proteins, N-glycopeptides, glycoproteins, and glycosylation sites. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that SDS provided superior reproducibility, with approximately 85% of quantified proteins exhibiting coefficients of variation below 5%. Subcellular localization analysis at the global proteome level showed that SDS enabled more comprehensive extraction of proteins from multiple cellular compartments, including the nucleus, cytoplasm, mitochondria, and plasma membrane, indicating reduced extraction bias toward specific subcellular regions. Consistently, subcellular localization analysis of identified glycoproteins revealed enhanced coverage of membrane-associated compartments, particularly the plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, and lysosome. In addition, the analysis of glycan type classification for intact N-glycopeptides revealed that the SDS lysis buffer demonstrated the most comprehensive identification capability for glycopeptides with multiple glycosylation modifications in both cell lines. MPER and UA showed a highly consistent distribution across various glycosylation types, whereas the guanidine hydrochloride method was comparatively least effective. Overall, these results establish SDS as a robust lysis buffer for comprehensive, reproducible, and quantitatively stable proteomic and N-glycoproteomic analyses, providing practical guidance for buffer selection in quantitative glycosylation-focused studies.