# Fidgeting Increases Pupil Diameter During Auditory Processing in Young Healthy Adults

**Authors:** Satoko Kataoka, Hideki Miyaguchi, Chinami Ishizuki, Hiroshi Fukuda, Masanori Yasunaga, Hikari Kirimoto

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/brainsci16020127 · Brain Sciences · 2026-01-24

## TL;DR

Fidgeting with hands or legs increases pupil size during listening tasks, suggesting higher arousal, but does not hurt performance in young adults.

## Contribution

Shows that fidgeting may help maintain attention during auditory tasks without impairing performance.

## Key findings

- Both hand and leg fidgeting increased pupil diameter during auditory processing.
- Hand fidgeting caused the largest increase in pupil size, indicating higher arousal or engagement.
- Auditory task performance remained stable despite physiological changes from fidgeting.

## Abstract

What are the main findings?
Both hand and leg fidgeting increased pupil diameter during auditory processing. Hand fidgeting produced the largest increase, indicating enhanced arousal or engagement rather than increased processing load.Despite these physiological changes, auditory task performance remained stable across all conditions. This suggests that mild fidgeting does not interfere with auditory processing in healthy young adults.

Both hand and leg fidgeting increased pupil diameter during auditory processing. Hand fidgeting produced the largest increase, indicating enhanced arousal or engagement rather than increased processing load.

Despite these physiological changes, auditory task performance remained stable across all conditions. This suggests that mild fidgeting does not interfere with auditory processing in healthy young adults.

What are the implications of the main findings?
Light fidgeting may serve as a simple, non-disruptive means of maintaining attention or preventing mind wandering during listening tasks.These results may inform educational or clinical approaches aimed at supporting attention regulation, particularly for individuals with attentional difficulties or auditory processing challenges. However, further evidence is needed.

Light fidgeting may serve as a simple, non-disruptive means of maintaining attention or preventing mind wandering during listening tasks.

These results may inform educational or clinical approaches aimed at supporting attention regulation, particularly for individuals with attentional difficulties or auditory processing challenges. However, further evidence is needed.

Background/Objectives: People often engage in small, repetitive movements—or “fidgeting”—while listening. This behavior has traditionally been regarded as a sign of inattention. However, recent perspectives suggest that these movements may support engagement and arousal regulation. Yet, little is known about how different types of fidgeting affect the allocation of cognitive resources during auditory processing. This study examined whether hand and leg fidgeting influence pupil-linked arousal and auditory task performance. Methods: Young, healthy adults aged 18–26 years completed four auditory processing tasks while performing either hand fidgeting (manipulating a small fidget toy) or leg fidgeting (very light ergometer pedaling). A control group did not fidget. Pupil-linked arousal was assessed using changes in pupil diameter, and listening performance was evaluated across tasks of varying difficulty. Results: Both forms of fidgeting caused pupil dilation compared to the control group, particularly in the case of Hand Fidgeting during the listening task with speech in noise and the fast speech task. Despite these physiological changes, there were no measurable differences in auditory task performance across conditions. Conclusions: Fidgeting modulates pupil-linked arousal without impairing auditory processing in young, healthy adults. Hand fidgeting may help sustain engagement during demanding listening tasks. However, because the fidgeting was intentional and task performance approached ceiling or floor levels, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary. Future studies should examine whether fidgeting supports arousal maintenance or listening performance in individuals with attentional vulnerabilities or auditory processing difficulties.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** developmental disorders (MESH:D002658), peripheral hearing impairment (MESH:C537626), hearing abnormalities (MESH:D034381), auditory difficulties (MESH:D051346), acute otitis media (MESH:D010033), mind wandering (MESH:D013009), anxiety disorders (MESH:D001008), otitis media with effusion (MESH:D010034), ADHD (MESH:D001289), Auditory (MESH:D006311), APD (MESH:D001308), injury to (MESH:D014947), Pupil dilation (MESH:D011681)
- **Chemicals:** DAQ (MESH:C027262)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12938263/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12938263/full.md

## References

81 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12938263/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12938263