# From the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial to Antibody-Mediated Optic Neuritis: Four Decades of Progress and Unanswered Questions

## TL;DR

Optic neuritis has evolved from a single condition to multiple distinct types, requiring advanced diagnostics and targeted treatments to improve patient outcomes.

## Contribution

This review highlights the shift in optic neuritis classification and the need for updated diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

## Key findings

- Optic neuritis is now recognized as multiple biologically distinct subtypes with different prognoses and treatments.
- MRI, OCT, and CSF analysis are essential for early differentiation and targeted therapy initiation.
- Global disparities in diagnostic access and unresolved challenges in biomarker identification persist.

## Abstract

Optic neuritis (ON) has been recognized since antiquity, but its modern clinical identity emerged only in the late 19th century and was definitively shaped by the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT). The ONTT established the natural history, visual prognosis, association with multiple sclerosis (MS), and therapeutic response to corticosteroids, building the foundation for contemporary ON management. Subsequent discoveries—most notably aquaporin-4 IgG-associated ON (AQP4-ON), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated ON (MOG-ON), and double-negative ON—have fundamentally transformed this paradigm, shifting ON from a seemingly uniform demyelinating syndrome to a group of biologically distinct disorders. These subtypes differ in immunopathology, clinical course, MRI features, retinal injury patterns, CSF profiles, and long-term outcomes, making early and accurate differentiation essential. MRI provides key distinctions in lesion length, orbital tissue inflammation, bilateral involvement, and chiasmal or optic tract extension. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers complementary structural biomarkers, including severe early ganglion cell loss in AQP4-ON, relative preservation in MOG-ON, and variable patterns in double-negative ON. CSF analysis further refines diagnosis, with oligoclonal bands strongly supporting MS-ON. Together, these modalities enable precise early stratification and timely initiation of targeted immunotherapy, which is critical for preventing irreversible visual disability. Despite major advances, significant unmet needs persist. Access to high-resolution MRI, OCT, cell-based antibody assays, and evidence-based treatments remains limited in many regions, contributing to global disparities in outcomes. The understanding of the pathogenesis of double-negative optic neuritis, the identification of reliable biomarkers of relapse and visual recovery, and the determination of standardized cut-off values for multimodal diagnostic tools—including MRI, OCT, CSF analysis, and serological assays—remain unresolved challenges. Future research must expand biomarker discovery, refine imaging criteria, and ensure equitable global access to cutting-edge diagnostic platforms and therapeutic innovations. Four decades after the ONTT, ON remains a dynamic field of investigation, with ongoing advances holding the potential to transform care for patients worldwide. Together, these advances expose a fundamental tension between historically MS-centered diagnostic frameworks and the emerging biological heterogeneity of ON, a tension that underpins the structure and critical perspective of the present review.