# Confidence of Pediatric Primary Care Clinicians in Autism Screener Score and Their Own Diagnostic Impressions

**Authors:** Georgina Perez Liz, Andrea Trubanova Wieckowski, Autumn Austin, Alexia Faith Dickerson, Erika Frick, Ashley Dubin, Ashley de Marchena, Diana L. Robins

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/bs16020289 · Behavioral Sciences · 2026-02-17

## TL;DR

Pediatric clinicians' confidence in autism screening scores and their own diagnoses was studied, showing higher confidence when screening scores suggest higher autism likelihood.

## Contribution

This study provides insights into how pediatric clinicians use and interpret autism screening scores in primary care settings.

## Key findings

- PCCs reported high confidence in M-CHAT-R scores in 66% of cases.
- Confidence in diagnostic impressions was higher when aligned with M-CHAT-R likelihood.
- Language and social concerns were most associated with M-CHAT-R likelihood.

## Abstract

Autism-specific screening and developmental surveillance in primary care aid identification of autism. In this study, we assessed primary care clinicians’ (PCCs’) reported confidence in screening scores from the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised (M-CHAT-R) and in their own diagnostic impressions. Four PCCs provided data for 50 children aged 16–36 months for whom they had any developmental concern. PCCs’ diagnostic impressions were “Definitely Autism” for 15 children (30%), “Unsure—Needs Further Evaluation” for 25 children (50%) and “Definitely Not Autism” for 10 children (20%). They reported High Confidence on the screener score in 33 cases (66%). Of the 17 cases for whom PCCs reported having Low Confidence on the M-CHAT-R, 14 children (82.3%) had a Low Likelihood score, with no significant association between M-CHAT-R likelihood and PCC’s confidence in the screening score. PCCs’ diagnostic impressions were concordant with the M-CHAT-R autism likelihood in 42% of cases, with a significantly higher mean in confidence rating when compared to the non-concordant cases. Language development and social engagement were the most frequently endorsed concerns by PCCs, with significant associations between these concerns and M-CHAT-R likelihood. Our results suggest that, when developmental concerns exist, PCCs may place greater confidence in the M-CHAT-R when scores indicate a higher likelihood of autism, and that confidence in their own diagnostic impressions may be associated with concordance with the screener score.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** autism (MONDO:0005260)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** head- (MESH:D006258), Autism (MESH:D001321), delay in language development (MESH:D007805), M-CHAT-R (MESH:D013978), gross-motor delay (MESH:C536704), PCC (OMIM:115700), ASD (MESH:D000067877), injury to (MESH:D014947), PCCs (MESH:D003428), Disabilities (MESH:D009069), motor (MESH:D000068079), emotional dysregulation (MESH:D021081), restricted repetitive behaviors (MESH:D002313), developmental delay (MESH:D002658)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937689/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937689/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937689/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937689