# Active Antimicrobial Packaging Systems: Mechanisms of Microbial Control and Applications in Food Preservation

**Authors:** Esteban Pérez, Esther Sanjuán, Miroslav Jůzl, António Raposo, Ariana Saraiva, José Raduan Jaber, Conrado Carrascosa

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/biology15040325 · Biology · 2026-02-12

## TL;DR

Active antimicrobial packaging helps control harmful microbes in food by releasing substances that weaken or kill them, improving food safety and shelf life.

## Contribution

This paper reviews mechanisms and applications of active antimicrobial packaging, emphasizing their biological impact on microbial physiology.

## Key findings

- Active packaging can reduce harmful microbes like Listeria and Salmonella in real food environments.
- Natural antimicrobials and nanoparticles disrupt microbial cell membranes and metabolic pathways.
- Oxygen scavengers in packaging suppress aerobic spoilage but may promote anaerobic growth.

## Abstract

A World Health Organization estimate has identified some 200 types of diseases caused by food contaminated with microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, and parasites), of which some 30 species of bacteria are primarily responsible for food poisoning. Microorganisms, such as bacteria, yeasts, and molds, are naturally present in many foods, and while some are harmless, others can cause spoilage or serious illness. Keeping these microorganisms under control is one of the biggest challenges in protecting the safety and freshness of food. Traditional packaging slows their growth but cannot fully prevent them from surviving or spreading. This article examines new types of “active” packaging designed to directly fight harmful microorganisms. These smart materials can release natural substances from plants, helpful proteins, or very small particles that weaken or damage microbes before they can grow. Some systems also remove oxygen from the package, which stops many microorganisms from multiplying. Research using real foods shows that these technologies can greatly reduce the presence of harmful microbes and extend the life of products such as meat, dairy, fruits, and vegetables. However, more work is needed to be sure that these materials are completely safe for people and the environment and that they perform well in all food types. By understanding how microorganisms behave in packaged foods, scientists can develop better tools to protect consumers, reduce food waste, and support a more sustainable and secure food system.

Microbial spoilage and foodborne pathogens remain central challenges in food safety, driven by the metabolic resilience and ecological adaptability of bacteria, yeasts, and molds across diverse food matrices. Active antimicrobial packaging has emerged as a biologically informed strategy that directly targets microbial physiology through controlled release or contact-mediated mechanisms. These systems employ natural antimicrobials, bacteriocins, essential oils, and metal nanoparticles to disrupt cell membranes, inhibit enzymatic pathways, generate reactive oxygen species, or interfere with quorum sensing, resulting in substantial reductions in microorganisms such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., E. coli O157:H7, Pseudomonas spp., Brochothrix thermosphacta, and spoilage fungi. In real food environments, these interventions achieve multi-log reductions and attenuate microbial metabolism, though efficacy varies with pH, water activity, fat content, and storage temperature. Oxygen scavengers further reshape microbial ecology by suppressing aerobic spoilage organisms while inadvertently favoring anaerobic competitors. Despite promising outcomes, concerns regarding nanoparticle migration, microbial resistance potential, and matrix-dependent performance highlight the need for deeper microbiological validation. Future progress will require integrative research linking microbial ecology, packaging material science, and mechanistic toxicology. By aligning with microbial behavior at the cellular and ecosystem levels, active antimicrobial packaging represents a powerful, biologically grounded approach to mitigating foodborne risks.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Listeria monocytogenes (taxon 1639), Pseudomonas sp. #P (taxon 299395), Brochothrix thermosphacta (taxon 2756)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cytotoxicity (MESH:D064420), injury to (MESH:D014947), food poisoning (MESH:D005517)
- **Chemicals:** glycerol (MESH:D005990), caprylic acid (MESH:C031492), Basil essential oil (-), Copper oxide (MESH:C030973), curcumin (MESH:D003474), Carvacrol (MESH:C073316), enterocin (MESH:C012306), starch (MESH:D013213), amine (MESH:D000588), TPS (MESH:C089984), carbohydrate (MESH:D002241), amino acids (MESH:D000596), PLA (MESH:C033616), lipid (MESH:D008055), sucrose (MESH:D013395), citric acid (MESH:D019343), CO2 (MESH:D002245), Diacetyl (MESH:D003931), ROS (MESH:D017382), Cd (MESH:D002104), anthocyanins (MESH:D000872), rosemary oil (MESH:C053775), Cellulose (MESH:D002482), allyl isothiocyanate (MESH:C004471), sugar (MESH:D000073893), Chitosan (MESH:D048271), chlorine dioxide (MESH:C025109), salt (MESH:D012492), Zn (MESH:D015032), O2 (MESH:D010100), alginate (MESH:D000464), Metal (MESH:D008670), Fat (MESH:D005223), carbon (MESH:D002244), phenyllactic acid (MESH:C017648), polymer (MESH:D011108), polysaccharide (MESH:D011134), lactose (MESH:D007785), pectin (MESH:D010368), N2 (MESH:D009584), cinnamaldehyde (MESH:C012843), phenolic acids (MESH:C017616), Essential Oils (MESH:D009822), ZnO (MESH:D015034), Water (MESH:D014867), polyethylene (MESH:D020959), thymol (MESH:D013943), Ag (MESH:D012834), Copper (MESH:D003300)
- **Species:** Listeria monocytogenes (species) [taxon 1639], Shewanella putrefaciens (species) [taxon 24], Zygosaccharomyces (genus) [taxon 4953], Enterobacter cloacae (species) [taxon 550], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Staphylococcus aureus (species) [taxon 1280], Leptospira sp. AB (species) [taxon 103236], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Carnobacterium (genus) [taxon 2747], Penicillium commune (species) [taxon 36653], Vibrio parahaemolyticus (species) [taxon 670], Myceliophthora sp. AP (species) [taxon 1176335], Oryctolagus cuniculus (domestic rabbit, species) [taxon 9986], gut metagenome (species) [taxon 749906], Gallus gallus (bantam, species) [taxon 9031], Bacillus cereus (species) [taxon 1396], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Spinacia oleracea (spinach, species) [taxon 3562], Salmonella (genus) [taxon 590], Brochothrix thermosphacta (species) [taxon 2756], Aspergillus niger (species) [taxon 5061], Bison (genus) [taxon 9900], Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast, species) [taxon 4932], Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (no rank) [taxon 149539], Escherichia coli O157:H7 (no rank) [taxon 83334], Clostridium botulinum (species) [taxon 1491], Pseudomonas aeruginosa (species) [taxon 287], Campylobacter jejuni (species) [taxon 197], Pseudomonas lundensis (species) [taxon 86185], Salmonella enterica (species) [taxon 28901], Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (no rank) [taxon 90371], Fungi (kingdom) [taxon 4751], Allium sativum (garlic, species) [taxon 4682], Meleagris gallopavo (common turkey, species) [taxon 9103], Cronobacter sakazakii (species) [taxon 28141], Serratia (genus) [taxon 613]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937669/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937669/full.md

## References

161 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937669/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937669