# Susceptibility Profile and Multiple Antibiotics Resistance of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Enterococci from Small-Scale Cattle Farms in Tennessee

**Authors:** Goodness Olakanmi, Maureen Nzomo, Bharat Pokharel, Abdullah Mafiz, Agnes Kilonzo-Nthenge

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics15020217 · Antibiotics · 2026-02-17

## TL;DR

This study examines antibiotic resistance in bacteria from small cattle farms in Tennessee, finding high resistance levels in manure and soil, and highlights the need for better antimicrobial practices.

## Contribution

The study provides the first detailed characterization of antimicrobial resistance in small-scale cattle farms in Tennessee, focusing on environmental reservoirs and farmer practices.

## Key findings

- Manure and soil had the highest Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Index (MARI) values, indicating they are high-risk reservoirs for resistant bacteria.
- Enterococcus showed consistent resistance to all three tested antibiotics, while E. coli and Klebsiella exhibited varied resistance patterns.
- Over two-thirds of farmers were aware of antimicrobial resistance as a public health issue, and most consulted veterinarians before antibiotic use.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance in food–animal environments threatens sustainable production and public health, yet small farms remain poorly characterized as potential reservoirs of antimicrobial resistant bacteria. To address this, we investigated the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Enterococcus spp. from small-scale cattle farms in Tennessee, USA. Methods: Over one year, 153 environmental samples (soil, manure, water) were collected from 17 farms. Target bacteria were isolated and confirmed using selective agar, biochemical tests, and PCR, and tested against 12 antibiotics using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion test. Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Index (MARI) and multidrug resistance (MDR) profiles were summarized. A complementary farmer survey of 26 farmers captured veterinary access, antibiotic use, manure handling, record keeping, and awareness of antimicrobial resistance. Results: Prevalence was highest for Enterococcus spp. (41.8%), followed by E. coli (23.5%) and Klebsiella spp. (12.4%). Seasonal variation was significant for E. coli and Enterococcus (p < 0.05). Winter manure yielded highest detection of E. coli (55.6%) and Enterococcus (53.8%), whereas Klebsiella peaked in Fall soil (19.1%). Resistance patterns varied across species, with Enterococcus showing consistent resistance to all three. E. coli frequently resisted erythromycin, ampicillin, and azithromycin; and Klebsiella commonly resisted erythromycin, ampicillin, and cefotaxime, though some of these reflect intrinsic resistance rather than acquired clinical resistance. MARI values were 0.92 in manure and soil, identifying them as high-risk reservoirs. We identified 29 distinct MDR pattern. Bipartite network visualization highlighted “resistance hubs” around erythromycin, ampicillin, and vancomycin, particularly in Enterococcus. In our study, 76.9% of farmers consulted veterinarians before antibiotic use, 57.7% kept written antibiotic records, and 65.4% were aware of AMR as a public health issue. Small-scale cattle farms are potential reservoirs of multidrug resistant commensal bacteria. Conclusions: These findings provide an evidence-based foundation to guide targeted antimicrobial stewardship and promote sustainable management practices in small-scale food animal farms.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** erythromycin (PubChem CID 12560), ampicillin (PubChem CID 6249), azithromycin (PubChem CID 447043), cefotaxime (PubChem CID 5742673), vancomycin (PubChem CID 14969)
- **Species:** Escherichia coli (taxon 562)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** Extended spectrum beta lactamase [NCBI Gene 13982007], BMP1 (bone morphogenetic protein 1) [NCBI Gene 649] {aka OI13, PCOLC, PCP, TLD}
- **Diseases:** AMR (MESH:C565965), injury to (MESH:D014947), MDR (MESH:D018088), AMR (MESH:D060467), opportunistic infections (MESH:D009894), NAL (MESH:D011015), deaths (MESH:D003643), infections (MESH:D007239)
- **Chemicals:** NAL (MESH:D009268), Water (MESH:D014867), MEM (MESH:D000077731), cefepime (MESH:D000077723), Carbapenem (MESH:D015780), VAN (MESH:D014640), GEN (MESH:D005839), ERY (MESH:D004917), AZM (MESH:D017963), DOX (MESH:D004318), FEP (MESH:D011138), ethidium bromide (MESH:D004996), agar (MESH:D000362), AMP (MESH:D000667), IPM (MESH:D015378), polypropylene (MESH:D011126), agarose (MESH:D012685), glycopeptides (MESH:D006020), beta lactams (MESH:D047090), CHL (MESH:D002701), CTX (MESH:D002439), 20E (-), glycerol (MESH:D005990), macrolide (MESH:D018942)
- **Species:** Enterococcus faecalis (species) [taxon 1351], Escherichia coli DSM 30083 = JCM 1649 = ATCC 11775 (strain) [taxon 866789], Klebsiella (genus) [taxon 570], Enterococcus (genus) [taxon 1350], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Klebsiella pneumoniae (species) [taxon 573], Enterobacteriaceae (enterobacteria, family) [taxon 543], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Enterococcus faecium (species) [taxon 1352], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937398/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937398/full.md

## References

64 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937398/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937398