# Sex and Age Differences in Decision-Making Under Risk by Wild Balinese Long-Tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis fascicularis): A Field Experimental Study

**Authors:** Caleb Bunselmeyer, Noëlle Gunst, I Nengah Wandia, Robert J. Williams, Elsa Addessi, Jean-Baptiste Leca

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ani16040617 · Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI · 2026-02-15

## TL;DR

Wild macaques show varied risk preferences influenced by age and sex, with juveniles adapting choices based on past outcomes.

## Contribution

The study reveals how age and sex interact to shape risk preferences in wild macaques, highlighting individual variability.

## Key findings

- Macaques showed no group-level preference for safe or risky choices but had strong individual differences.
- Male juveniles and older adults were more risk-prone than younger males, while adult females were more risk-prone than juvenile females.
- Juveniles adapted their choices based on previous outcomes, following a win–stay strategy.

## Abstract

Most past research on risk preferences in primates focused on captive animals and neglected individual differences. We studied how 33 wild Balinese long-tailed macaques of different ages and sexes make risky choices. The animals were given a choice between a small reward they would always get and a larger reward they would get only sometimes. Overall, the macaques did not prefer either the safe or the risky option. However, individuals differed greatly. Some macaques often chose the risky option, others preferred the safe one, and many showed no clear preference. These differences were strongly linked to age, sex, and what happened in previous trials. Age and sex worked together in shaping risk preferences. Among males, juveniles and older adults were more risk-prone than younger adults. Among females, adults were more risk-prone than juveniles. Juveniles were also flexible in their choices, tending to repeat a risky choice after it paid off, a pattern known as “win–stay, lose–shift”. This may help young animals learn during development. Importantly, these differences were not due to confusion, since the macaques made correct choices when outcomes were clearly visible. Our findings highlight strong individual variation in primate risk preferences shaped by demographic factors.

This study examines risky decision-making in a free-ranging population of Balinese long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis fascicularis), addressing gaps in research that have largely focused on captive primates and have rarely considered individual differences by age and sex. Thirty-three macaques of different age–sex classes were tested using a choice task contrasting a guaranteed small reward with a probabilistic larger reward. At the group level, macaques showed no preference for safe or risky options. However, substantial individual variation emerged: some individuals were risk-prone, others risk-averse, and many indifferent. Notably, age and sex interacted in shaping risk preferences. Among males, adults and juveniles were more risk-prone than younger adults, whereas among females, adults were more risk-prone than juveniles. Juveniles also displayed outcome-dependent flexibility, choosing the risky option more often after a previous successful risky choice, consistent with a win–stay strategy. Like in rodents, this pattern may reflect adaptive learning during developmental transitions. Importantly, the observed behavioral differences were not due to misunderstanding of the task, as macaques reliably chose the larger option when outcomes were visible. This pronounced individual variability in primate risk preferences underscore the importance of considering demographic factors when characterizing species-typical risk preferences.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Macaca fascicularis fascicularis (taxon 1215360)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** aggressive (MESH:D010554), deformities (MESH:D009140), injury to (MESH:D014947)
- **Species:** Macaca (macaque, genus) [taxon 9539], Varecia rubra (Red ruffed lemur, species) [taxon 554167], Sapajus (genus) [taxon 1532884], Pan troglodytes (chimpanzee, species) [taxon 9598], Arachis hypogaea (goober, species) [taxon 3818], Gorilla gorilla (gorilla, species) [taxon 9593], Pan paniscus (bonobo, species) [taxon 9597], Musa acuminata (banana, species) [taxon 4641], Cebus (capuchin monkeys, genus) [taxon 9513], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Lemuridae (lemurs, family) [taxon 9445], Lemur catta (Ring-tailed lemur, species) [taxon 9447], Pongo abelii (orang utan, species) [taxon 9601], Macaca fascicularis (crab eating macaque, species) [taxon 9541], Cercopithecidae (monkey, family) [taxon 9527], Macaca mulatta (rhesus macaque, species) [taxon 9544], Colobus sp. (colobus monkeys, species) [taxon 34824], Macaca fascicularis fascicularis (subspecies) [taxon 1215360], Eulemur mongoz (mongoose lemur, species) [taxon 34828]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937374/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937374/full.md

## References

66 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937374/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937374