# Antimicrobial Resistance in Indicator Microorganisms Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. from Healthy Dairy Cattle in Latvia

**Authors:** Madara Nikolajenko, Liga Kovalcuka, Ivars Lusis, Aija Malniece, Armands Veksins, Daiga Galina, Anda Valdovska, Kaspars Kovalenko

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ani16040597 · Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI · 2026-02-13

## TL;DR

This study examines antibiotic resistance in gut bacteria from healthy Latvian dairy cows, finding low resistance overall but noting higher risks on larger farms.

## Contribution

The study provides new data on antimicrobial resistance in indicator bacteria from clinically healthy Latvian dairy cattle, emphasizing farm size as a potential risk factor.

## Key findings

- Resistance levels in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. from healthy Latvian dairy cows were generally low.
- Multidrug resistance was more common in isolates from larger farms and milk samples.
- Enterococcus spp. showed high resistance to quinupristin–dalfopristin, an antibiotic not used in Latvian dairy farming.

## Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global concern because bacteria that no longer respond to antibiotics can spread between animals, the environment, and humans. Within the One Health framework, dairy production systems play an important role in this process, as bacteria from healthy cows can be disseminated through milk, manure, and the farm environment. In this study, bacteria isolated from clinically healthy dairy cows in Latvia were examined to determine their resistance to antibiotics that are critically important in human medicine. Rectal swab samples were collected from cows to isolate two common gut bacteria as indicators of cumulative antimicrobial pressure, and milk samples were also taken from bulk tanks to assess AMR relevant to food safety. Overall, resistance levels were low, and most bacteria remained susceptible to critically important antibiotics. However, some bacteria showed resistance to multiple drugs, particularly those isolated from larger farms, suggesting that farm conditions may increase the risk of more resistant bacteria developing and spreading. These findings highlight the importance of responsible and prudent antibiotic use on farms and the need for continued monitoring of antibiotic resistance. Understanding how resistance develops and spreads helps protect animal health, food safety, and public health.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in food-producing animals is a growing One Health concern. However, data on AMR in indicator microorganisms from clinically healthy dairy cattle in Latvia remain limited. This study aimed to characterize the AMR profiles of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from rectal swabs and bulk-tank milk collected from 18 dairy farms between February and May 2025. Bacterial identification was performed using conventional culturing and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the disk diffusion (Kirby–Bauer) method, interpreted according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines. Resistance levels were further quantified using resistance scores (R-scores) and the Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Index (MARI). In total, 582 E. coli and 428 Enterococcus spp. isolates were recovered from rectal swabs, with E. coli showing the highest resistance to ampicillin (12.5%) and amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (6.7%), whereas resistance to tetracycline was rare (0.3%). Enterobacteriaceae from milk exhibited higher resistance to ampicillin (45.8%) and amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (20.8%). Among Enterococcus spp., resistance was highest to an antibiotic not used in dairy cows in Latvia quinupristin–dalfopristin (69.2%), while resistance to vancomycin and linezolid remained low (0.5% each). Milk-derived enterococci showed a comparable pattern, with additional resistance to streptomycin (25%). Overall, resistance levels and multidrug resistance were low. However, the presence of sporadic resistant isolates and elevated MARI values, particularly in large-scale farms and milk-derived bacteria, highlights the importance of continued AMR surveillance and prudent antimicrobial use in the Latvian dairy sector.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ampicillin (PubChem CID 6249), amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (PubChem CID 6435924), tetracycline (PubChem CID 54675776), quinupristin–dalfopristin (PubChem CID 11979418), vancomycin (PubChem CID 14969), linezolid (PubChem CID 3929), streptomycin (PubChem CID 5297)
- **Species:** Escherichia coli (taxon 562)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** AMR (MESH:D060467), infections (MESH:D007239), injury to (MESH:D014947), Antibiotic (MESH:D004761), mastitis (MESH:D008413)
- **Chemicals:** CRO (MESH:D002443), sulfonamides (MESH:D013449), AMC (MESH:D019980), macrolides (MESH:D018942), TMP (MESH:D014295), cephalosporins (MESH:D002511), LZD (MESH:D000069349), STR (MESH:D013307), CIP (MESH:D002939), azithromycin (MESH:D017963), Azide Dextrose Broth (-), streptogramin (MESH:D025361), tetracycline (MESH:D013752), Penicillin (MESH:D010406), CLX (MESH:D002506), ERV (MESH:C571179), aminoglycosides (MESH:D000617), GEN (MESH:D005839), amoxicillin (MESH:D000658), quinupristin-dalfopristin (MESH:C062940), AMP (MESH:D000667), IMP (MESH:D015378), water (MESH:D014867), TS (MESH:D015662), CPM (MESH:D000077723), tetracyclines (MESH:D013754), carbapenems (MESH:D015780), glycopeptides (MESH:D006020), VAN (MESH:D014640)
- **Species:** Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Pseudomonas aeruginosa (species) [taxon 287], Staphylococcus aureus (species) [taxon 1280], Enterobacter cloacae (species) [taxon 550], Lelliottia amnigena (species) [taxon 61646], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Enterococcus durans (species) [taxon 53345], Hafnia alvei (species) [taxon 569], Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (species) [taxon 40324], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Klebsiella (genus) [taxon 570], Enterococcus faecium (species) [taxon 1352], Enterobacteriaceae (enterobacteria, family) [taxon 543], Enterococcus faecalis (species) [taxon 1351], Raoultella [taxon 160674], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Citrobacter freundii (species) [taxon 546]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937363/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937363/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937363/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12937363