# Comparison of probiotics to lactulose for minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

**Authors:** Qiufeng He, Zhili Chen, Yang Deng, Chuangjie Mao, Yue Fan

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1780891 · Frontiers in Medicine · 2026-02-12

## TL;DR

This study compares probiotics and lactulose for treating early-stage liver-related brain dysfunction and finds similar effectiveness but fewer side effects with probiotics.

## Contribution

First meta-analysis directly comparing probiotics and lactulose for minimal hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis patients.

## Key findings

- Probiotics and lactulose showed similar efficacy in reversing minimal hepatic encephalopathy.
- Probiotics had significantly fewer adverse events compared to lactulose.
- No significant differences were found in preventing overt hepatic encephalopathy or reducing ammonia levels.

## Abstract

Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) represents a reversible, early-stage form of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Although probiotics have been extensively studied for MHE management, direct comparative evidence against standard lactulose therapy remains limited. This meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of probiotics versus lactulose in cirrhotic patients with MHE.

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were systematically searched from inception to August 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing probiotics with lactulose for the treatment of MHE in patients with cirrhosis. Extracted outcomes included MHE reversal, overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) development, serum ammonia reduction, and adverse events (AEs).

Five studies involving 345 cirrhotic patients were included. Pooled analyses showed no statistically significant differences between probiotics and lactulose in reversing MHE (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.79–1.20; p = 0.822), preventing OHE development (RR: 1.40, 95% CI: 0.75–2.61; p = 0.289), and reducing serum ammonia levels (SMD: −0.05, 95% CI: −0.29 to 0.19; p = 0.678). In contrast, probiotics were associated with a significantly lower incidence of AEs compared with lactulose (RR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.05–0.60; p = 0.005).

This meta-analysis found no evidence that probiotics are superior or inferior to lactulose in terms of MHE reversal, prevention of OHE, and reduction of serum ammonia levels. Probiotics were associated with fewer AEs, suggesting a potential safety advantage. Further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** lactulose (PubChem CID 11333), ammonia (PubChem CID 222)
- **Diseases:** cirrhosis (MONDO:0005155), hepatic encephalopathy (MONDO:0001711)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infection (MESH:D007239), gastrointestinal AEs (MESH:D002318), attention deficits (MESH:D001289), Hyperammonemia (MESH:D022124), gastrointestinal (MESH:D005767), neuropsychiatric syndrome (MESH:C000631768), toxicity (MESH:D064420), altered consciousness (MESH:D003244), cognitive deficits (MESH:D003072), abdominal distension (MESH:D000007), HE (MESH:D006501), neurotoxic (MESH:D020258), impaired driving capacity (MESH:D060825), flatulence (MESH:D005414), liver cirrhosis (MESH:D008103), abdominal pain (MESH:D015746), neuroinflammation (MESH:D000090862), inflammation (MESH:D007249), cirrhosis (MESH:D005355), sleep disturbances (MESH:D012893), cirrhotic (MESH:D000094724), nausea (MESH:D009325), fatigue (MESH:D005221), diarrhea (MESH:D003967), accidents (MESH:D000081084)
- **Chemicals:** L-ornithine L-aspartate (MESH:C002939), rifaximin (MESH:D000078262), prebiotics (MESH:D056692), ammonia (MESH:D000641), BCAAs (MESH:D000597), Lactulose (MESH:D007792)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12936003/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12936003/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12936003/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12936003