Expression of Concern: Housing investment and family entrepreneurship: Evidence from China

Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFamily Business Performance and Succession · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Corporate Finance and Governance
After this article [1] was published, the following issues were identified:
The first author declared that they are unable to share the data due to data sharing restrictions imposed by the data owner, the China Household Finance Survey and Research Center of Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (http://chfs.swufe.edu.cn). The authors provided documentation to the Editors to confirm that they had permission to use the data set.
Regarding data extraction and preprocessing, the first author stated that they extracted household samples from the CHFS 2015 database from 29 provinces across the country, focusing on screening variables related to housing investment (e.g., housing holdings, type of ownership, loan status, etc.) and entrepreneurial behaviors (agricultural entrepreneurship, commercial entrepreneurship), and processed them through the Stata software; they excluded samples with missing and extreme values of key variables, resulting in a sample of 32,986 valid households.
The first author acknowledged the lack of citations in the Introduction section, and provided supporting references. The Editors were unable to confirm that all provided references support the corresponding statements, and they consider this issue unresolved.
The first author provided a rationale for claims regarding causation; however, the editors remain concerned that the study design was not sufficient to confirm causation rather than correlation.
The first author acknowledged the absence of discussion of the study’s limitations, and provided the following text to address this issue, which the Editors consider resolved: “First, in terms of the division of entrepreneurship types, entrepreneurship is simply categorized into agricultural entrepreneurship and commercial entrepreneurship, and this dichotomy fails to comprehensively cover the rich and diverse forms of entrepreneurship, and emerging forms of entrepreneurship such as high-tech entrepreneurship, social entrepreneurship, and digital entrepreneurship are not included in the scope of the study. Second, there are obvious limitations in data timeliness, as the study mainly uses data from the 2015 China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), which is a long time ago, during which China’s housing market and entrepreneurial environment have changed to some extent. Finally, this study did not directly incorporate the household income variable, which may underestimate or overestimate the independent impact of housing due to the correlation between income and housing assets.”
In light of the cumulative issues and concerns which were not resolved in our discussions with the authors, the PLOS One Editors issue this Expression of Concern. Readers are advised to interpret the article [1] with caution.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
