# Social justice for adults with high body weight: a systematic review

**Authors:** Imogen Sophia Weidinger, Leonie Josefa Renelt, Solveig Lena Hansen

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12939-026-02792-4 · International Journal for Equity in Health · 2026-02-21

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how social justice theories can help address health inequalities for adults with high body weight by examining ethical concepts and practical steps.

## Contribution

The study provides a systematic review of how social justice is conceptualized in obesity-related public health ethics, offering a foundation for interdisciplinary research.

## Key findings

- The review identified 33 relevant texts discussing obesity through ethical lenses like responsibility, autonomy, and stigma.
- Social justice theories are used to identify injustices and guide policies, though a unified framework is still emerging.
- The analysis highlights a focus on the Global North and calls for more interdisciplinary and translational work.

## Abstract

Health inequalities that arise form structural and social factors beyond an individual’s control (e.g., socioeconomic status (SES), education access, or neighbourhood and built environment) are widely regarded as unjust in public health ethics. However, to be translated into practice, meaningful calls for greater social justice in health must be grounded in a clear and robust conception of justice. Against this backdrop, this systematic review examines how notions of social justice are conceptualized and operationalized in responses to public health challenges, using obesity as paradigmatic example.

Following a PRISMA guideline for systematic reviews on ethics literature we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and BeLit in March 2024 and identified 1,377 titles. Screening, data extraction, and analysis were conducted independently by two authors. A total of 33 texts were included in this study. The analysis followed the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) framework, providing a structured and theory-oriented interpretation. The qualitative software ATLAS.ti supported the analysis throughout. This systematic review was not registered.

While global inequalities are extensively studied, ethical debates focus mainly on the Global North. The included literature discusses obesity primarily in terms of responsibility, autonomy, disease concepts, stigma, healthcare and food access, as well as prevention. Social justice theories helped to identify injustices and guide policy, although a unified understanding remains emergent.

This paper examines how ethical theories can guide efforts to advance social justice for adults with high body weight (AHBW) and identifies practical steps forward, thereby providing a robust starting point for interdisciplinary research and translational work.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-026-02792-4.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** unhealthy eating (MESH:D001068), discrimination (MESH:D010468), Weight stigma (MESH:D015431), overweight (MESH:D050177), Obesity (MESH:D009765), AHBW (MESH:D001835), Pickwinian syndrome (MESH:D013577), cardiometabolic multimorbidity (MESH:D024821)
- **Chemicals:** sugary drink (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12933919/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12933919/full.md

## References

6 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12933919/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12933919