Correction: Extubation outcomes in critically ill post-craniotomy patients: A retrospective cohort study
Jianfang Zhou, Xu-Ying Luo, Guangzhi Shi, Hong-Liang Li, Guang-Qiang Chen

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Fig 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances · Respiratory Support and Mechanisms · Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Notice of Republication
This article [1] was republished on October 21, 2025, to address an issue identified post-publication. An updated version of S1 File is provided with this notice. Please download this article again to view the correct version.
The article’s Data Availability statement is updated to: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information file.
In addition to the concerns above, the corresponding author contacted PLOS about errors in Fig 1, and Tables 1–2;
In Fig 1, the number of cases for the third extubation attempt is incorrectly duplicated from the second attempt; the correct value is 14, not 177. The correct Fig 1 is provided here.In Tables 1 and 2, in the fifth column, the number of tracheostomy cases are erroneously recorded as 230, while the correct value is 203. These errors were carried over into the percentage calculations within the same columns, however, the p-values are correct. The correct Tables 1 and 2 with updated tracheostomy case percentages are provided here.In Table 2, the case numbers for different craniotomy indications (rows 3–6) are misaligned with their corresponding column headings. Please see the correct Table 2 below.
Table 1: Demographic and outcome comparisons among direct tracheostomy patients and those with first extubation success or failure.
Table 2: Comparison of perioperative characteristics among patients undergoing direct tracheostomy versus those with successful or failed first extubation.
After follow-up with the corresponding author and consultation with a member of the Editorial Board, the PLOS One Editors determined that the above errors do not affect the main conclusions of [1].
Patient screening and extubation outcomes flowchart.ICU, intensive care unit; LOS, Length of stay.
Supporting information
S1 FileRaw data.(XLSX)
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
