# Systematic evaluation of computational methods for cell segmentation

**Authors:** Rongrong Yang, Guangfu Xue, Zuxiang Wang, Yideng Cai, Wenyi Yang, Jinhao Que, Renjie Tan, Haoxiu Sun, Pingping Wang, Zhaochun Xu, Qinghua Jiang, Wenyang Zhou

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbag066 · Briefings in Bioinformatics · 2026-02-24

## TL;DR

This paper evaluates deep learning methods for cell segmentation, highlighting their superiority over traditional approaches, especially when using multimodal data.

## Contribution

A dual-dimensional classification framework and a benchmark test for evaluating deep learning cell segmentation methods.

## Key findings

- Deep learning models outperform traditional algorithms in cell segmentation.
- Integration of image and sequencing data enhances segmentation performance.
- The benchmark test assesses algorithms across effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency.

## Abstract

Cell segmentation plays a crucial role in elucidating cell structure and function, understanding disease mechanisms, and aiding pathological diagnosis. Current surveys primarily categorize methods by their technical evolution stages, which may not fully capture the paradigm shift brought by deep learning. Moreover, their evaluation scope is largely confined to image-only approaches, overlooking the significant potential of multimodal data in enhancing cell/nucleus segmentation performance. Therefore, we propose a dual-dimensional classification framework for deep learning methods. It categorizes such methods into two types: task-oriented (e.g. semantic or instance segmentation) and data-oriented (e.g. single or multimodal inputs). Based on this, we systematically classify and summarize methods across various segmentation tasks and imaging modalities. We also develop a benchmark test that covers both single-modal and multimodal methods. This test uses five diverse datasets, among which four are from conventional microscopy and one integrates sequencing with image data. Furthermore, it assesses seven algorithms based on three dimensions: effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency. Key findings indicate that deep learning models generally outperform traditional algorithms, with their advantage becoming more pronounced when image data is integrated with sequencing information.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** breast cancer (MESH:D001943), brain tumor (MESH:D001932), ganglioneuroblastoma (MESH:D018305), cancer (MESH:D009369), Wilms' tumor (MESH:D009396)
- **Chemicals:** DAPI (MESH:C007293)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090], Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast, species) [taxon 4932], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Cell lines:** BSST265 — Mus musculus (Mouse), Hybridoma (CVCL_J809)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12931453/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12931453/full.md

## References

157 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12931453/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12931453