# Symptom burden and patient characteristics in specialist palliative care: a descriptive analysis

## TL;DR

This study compares patient characteristics and symptom burden across different palliative care settings in Germany, highlighting the need for tailored care approaches.

## Contribution

The study provides the first systematic cross-setting comparison of specialist palliative care in Germany, identifying setting-specific patient needs and symptom profiles.

## Key findings

- Symptoms like weakness and poor mobility are common across all palliative care settings.
- Pain and poor appetite are most pronounced in home care, while anxiety is more prevalent in advisory teams.
- Functional status is low overall, with significant variation in palliative care phases across settings.

## Abstract

In Germany, specialist palliative care (SPC) is provided by palliative care units (PCU), hospital-based palliative care advisory (PCA) teams, and specialist palliative home care (SPHC) teams. Systematic cross-setting comparisons are lacking. Such comparisons are essential to identify setting-specific patient needs and differences and to inform tailoring of care structures, resource allocation, and training to setting-specific needs. We therefore aim to compare settings regarding patient characteristics, symptom/problem burden, functional status, and palliative care phase.

Secondary analysis of a prospective, cross-sectional, multi-centre study including 3,115 care episodes (PCU: 753; PCA: 1,568; SPHC: 794) across 29 SPC services. Data collection included symptom/problem burden using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS), functional status by Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS), and Palliative Care Phase. Presence of symptoms was defined as any IPOS item ≥ moderate, sometimes or partly addressed.

Patients had a mean age of 72 years, 51% were female, and 73% had cancer. Weakness (78–90%) and poor mobility (71–85%) were most frequent across all settings. Pain (54%) and poor appetite (63%) were most pronounced in SPHC, while anxiety (61%) dominated in PCA. Median IPOS sum scores were highest in SPHC (24), followed by PCA (22) and PCU (21). Median AKPS scores were overall low, with 30 in inpatient settings and 40 in SPHC, reflecting significant functional impairment. Palliative care phases varied significantly (p < .001), with the unstable phase predominant in PCU (43%) and PCA (34%), and the stable phase in SPHC (43%), on admission. High rates of “cannot assess” responses, especially in psychosocial and practical domains, influenced prevalence estimates.

Patients in German SPC experience substantial symptom burden and diverse care needs, varying by setting. The findings highlight the necessity for setting-tailored assessment tools, specialized training, and systemic development to improve care quality and patient outcomes.

Patients in SPC experience a consistently high level of care needs, though symptom profiles vary by setting. Each SPC setting plays a vital role in addressing complex care challenges, underscoring the importance of tailored, setting-specific approaches to effectively meet diverse patient needs and improve outcomes across different care environments.