# Digital Futures in an Ageing Society: Frontline Perspectives on Sociotechnical Imaginaries in Swedish Eldercare

**Authors:** Freja Morris, Fredrika Thelandersson, Helena Sandberg

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.70159 · Sociology of Health & Illness · 2026-02-23

## TL;DR

This paper explores how Swedish care professionals view digitalization in eldercare, highlighting their optimism despite challenges.

## Contribution

Introduces 'tech love goggles' and 'magic leap' to explain persistent techno-optimism in digitalised care.

## Key findings

- Care professionals maintain techno-optimism despite technological failures.
- Promissory discourses about digitalization are embraced at the frontline of care.
- Digital futures are idealized, potentially obscuring current care needs.

## Abstract

This article investigates how care professionals working with older adults in Sweden encounter, reproduce, and challenge sociotechnical imaginaries of a digitalised health and social care system. Drawing on interviews with 20 care professionals, we explore how promissory discourses that frame digitalisation as a solution to demographic and economic crises are taken up at the frontline of care. Despite regular experiences of technological malfunction and implementation challenges, care professionals maintain a persistent techno‐optimism and techno‐determinism in their narratives. We introduce the analytical concepts tech love goggles and the magic leap to explain how faith in digital futures is preserved amid present digital shortcomings and failures. Tech love goggles describes a tendency to idealise technology and deflect blame for its failures onto external factors, whereas the magic leap captures a future‐oriented logic in which present obstacles are expected to dissolve over time. Our findings highlight the performative power of sociotechnical imaginaries and suggest that optimism towards digital technologies can obscure the immediate needs and constraints of both workers and older care recipients. We argue for greater attention to the ethical and practical implications of deferring care solutions to an idealised digital future, especially for those whose time horizons are limited by age.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** NBEAL2 (neurobeachin like 2) [NCBI Gene 23218] {aka BDPLT4, GPS}
- **Diseases:** cognitive decline (MESH:D003072), dementia (MESH:D003704)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12930120/full.md

## References

50 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12930120/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12930120