# Mechanical performance of structural lightweight concrete with metallurgical coal aggregates

**Authors:** Toka Waleed, Mohammed Rady, Ibrahim Mohsen Mashhour, Mohammed El-Attar

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-37929-6 · Scientific Reports · 2026-02-20

## TL;DR

This study explores using metallurgical coal as a replacement for natural aggregates in concrete, finding it reduces weight and cost but also lowers mechanical strength.

## Contribution

The novelty lies in evaluating metallurgical coal as a structural lightweight concrete aggregate and its performance under various conditions.

## Key findings

- Compressive and flexural strength decreased with higher metallurgical coal content.
- Concrete with 25% and 50% MC maintained structural performance at elevated temperatures.
- 75% MC concrete was more cost-effective and required less reinforcing steel.

## Abstract

Many studies have investigated industrial by-products as alternatives to natural aggregates; however, little attention has been given to metallurgical coal (MC). This study evaluates MC as a replacement for coarse aggregate to develop structural lightweight concrete (SLWC), using five mixtures with MC contents of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% by weight. To this end, an experimental program on testing the microstructural and chemical analysis of MC and the mechanical properties of fresh and hardened concrete was conducted. The results showed that increasing MC reduced mechanical performance; compressive (flexural) strength decreased from 37.6 (5.17) MPa at 0% MC to 20.7 (2.75) MPa at 100% MC. Furthermore, increasing the MC content reduced the elastic modulus per four international codes. On the other hand, the results showed that MC significantly decreased density, achieving up to a 24.3% reduction relative to normal-weight concrete and satisfying lightweight classification. Moreover, concrete mixtures with 25% and 50% MC maintained adequate structural performance when subjected to elevated temperatures. From an economic perspective, 75% MC lightweight concrete was more cost-effective and required 12% less reinforcing steel than normal-weight concrete. These findings indicate that MC can improve natural resource sustainability and offer a cost-effective route for sustainable construction.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** water (MESH:D000069578), MC (MESH:D055008), cracks (MESH:D003387), SLWC (MESH:D020914), NWC (MESH:D015431), fire (MESH:D000092422)
- **Chemicals:** C (MESH:D002244), carbonates (MESH:D002254), steel (MESH:D013232), Copper (MESH:D003300), SO3 (MESH:C011118), water (MESH:D014867), iron (MESH:D007501), Al2O3 (MESH:D000537), Concrete (-), Graphite (MESH:D006108), sulfur (MESH:D013455), SiO2 (MESH:D012822), Quartz (MESH:D011791), Pumice (MESH:C005144), Oxide (MESH:D010087), CO2 (MESH:D002245), polypropylene (MESH:D011126)
- **Species:** Helianthus annuus (common sunflower, species) [taxon 4232], Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris (field beet, subspecies) [taxon 3555], Arachis hypogaea (goober, species) [taxon 3818]
- **Mutations:** C78M, C0138M, C0039M, C0109M, C0143M, C +- 1  C

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929701/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929701/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929701/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929701