# Cost-effectiveness analysis of Brolucizumab compared to Aflibercept and Ranibizumab in nAMD with persistent retinal fluid

**Authors:** Ricardo García-Serrano Fuertes, Andrés Romero Martínez, Jesús Suarez Pérez, Fernando López Herrero, Margarita Cabanás Jiménez, Antonio Flores Córdoba, José Luis Sánchez Vicente

PMC · DOI: 10.1177/11206721251388170 · European Journal of Ophthalmology · 2025-10-21

## TL;DR

This study compared the cost-effectiveness of Brolucizumab to other treatments for a type of AMD, finding it less cost-effective due to higher follow-up costs.

## Contribution

The study provides new real-world cost-effectiveness data for Brolucizumab in AMD treatment in a Spanish hospital setting.

## Key findings

- Brolucizumab was not cost-effective compared to Ranibizumab and Aflibercept over six months.
- Higher follow-up costs significantly impacted Brolucizumab's cost-effectiveness.
- There was a 43% probability of transitioning to Faricimab in the studied population.

## Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Brolucizumab in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and persistent retinal fluid unresponsive to previous therapies, within the context of a real-world clinical practice setting in a Spanish referral hospital. Furthermore, the study examined the probabilities of transitioning between therapies.

A 6-month treatment projection demonstrated that Brolucizumab was not cost-effective compared to Ranibizumab (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER]: −12.98) and Aflibercept (ICER: −47.64). Conversely, when assessing only drug and administration visit costs, Brolucizumab appeared cost-effective (ICER of 9.14 versus Aflibercept and 35.01 versus Ranibizumab). The increased burden of follow-up costs, which were €348.96 higher than those for Ranibizumab and €174.48 higher than Aflibercept, likely drove the trend towards non-cost-effectiveness. Additionally, the analysis indicated a 43% probability of transitioning to Faricimab within the studied population.

Brolucizumab was determined to be not cost-effective compared to Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in patients with exudative AMD and persistent retinal fluid, primarily due to a higher number of follow-up visits necessitated by its safety profile. Furthermore, newly observed vitreous opacities and a tendency towards the use of Faricimab were noted.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** age-related macular degeneration (MONDO:0005150), AMD (MONDO:0005150)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** vitreous opacities (MESH:D003318), AMD (MESH:D008268)
- **Chemicals:** Brolucizumab (MESH:C000622091), Faricimab (MESH:C000723200), Ranibizumab (MESH:D000069579)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929660/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929660/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929660/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929660