# Comprehensive Comparison of Features of Robotic Surgery Systems in Abdominal Surgeries: A Narrative Review Study

**Authors:** Mashallah Torabi, Mehrnaz Aghanouri, Fatemeh Hadavandsiri, Maryam Goodarzi

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.71894 · Health Science Reports · 2026-02-23

## TL;DR

This review compares various robotic surgery systems used in abdominal surgeries, highlighting their features and advancements over the past two decades.

## Contribution

The study provides a comprehensive analysis of 19 robotic systems, including less-studied ones like Saroa and Sina flex, addressing a gap in the literature.

## Key findings

- Nineteen robotic systems from multiple countries were identified and analyzed for their design and capabilities.
- Emerging systems like Saroa and Sina flex are highlighted, offering insights into less-researched technologies.
- The integration of artificial intelligence is expected to enhance robotic surgery efficiency and patient outcomes.

## Abstract

Over the past two decades, robotic‐assisted abdominal surgery has revolutionized the field of abdominal surgery. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive and current analysis of the latest robotic surgery systems employed in abdominal procedures, emphasizing their design, capabilities, and unique features.

We conducted a systematic search using PubMed, Google, and manufacturer websites, utilizing keywords such as robotic surgery, robotic‐assisted surgery, and specific robotic systems including da Vinci, Hugo, Versius, Flex, Senhance, Revo‐I, MicroHand S, Hinotori, Avatera, Bitrack, ENOS (SPORT), MIRA, Mantra, Medrobotics Flex, Dexter, Saroa, Toumai, SHURUI, and Sina
flex
.

Our review identified and analyzed 19 robotic systems from various countries, including the United States, Japan, South Korea, Iran, and China. This review not only highlights the features of these emerging robotic surgery systems but also delves into less‐studied systems, such as the Saroa and Sina
flex
 robotic surgery systems, thereby addressing a gap in the current literature.

Robotic‐assisted abdominal surgery continues to advance, offering greater precision and reduced invasiveness. Although high costs remain a challenge, ongoing technological progress and the introduction of new systems are improving both accessibility and performance. With the growing integration of artificial intelligence, robotic surgery is expected to become even more efficient, ultimately supporting surgeons and enhancing patient outcomes.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** tremor (MESH:D014202), prostate cancer (MESH:D011471), infection (MESH:D007239), postoperative pain (MESH:D010149), HD (MESH:D008228), organ injury (MESH:D009102)
- **Chemicals:** Dexter (-), S (MESH:D013455), NMPA (MESH:C062567), da (MESH:C025953)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929196/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929196/full.md

## References

80 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929196/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12929196