# Assessment of the feed additive consisting of benzoic acid (4d210) (VevoVitall®) for weaned piglets, pigs for fattening, sows and minor porcine species for fattening and for reproduction for the renewal of its authorisation (DSM Nutritional Products Ltd)

**Authors:** Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López‐Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto‐Maradona, Katerina Theodoridou, Jaume Galobart, Maria Vittoria Vettori, Eleni Gkimprixi

PMC · DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9919 · EFSA Journal · 2026-02-23

## TL;DR

This paper assesses the safety of benzoic acid (VevoVitall®) as a feed additive for pigs and related species, confirming its safety under approved conditions.

## Contribution

The study provides a renewed safety evaluation of benzoic acid for use in animal feed, confirming its continued approval.

## Key findings

- Benzoic acid (4d210) is safe for target animals, consumers, and the environment under approved conditions.
- The additive is irritant to skin, eyes, and respiratory system but not a skin sensitiser.
- Assessment of efficacy was not required for the renewal of authorisation.

## Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of the authorisation of benzoic acid (4d210) (VevoVitall®) as a zootechnical feed additive for weaned piglets, pigs for fattening, sows and minor porcine species for fattening and for reproduction. The Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) concluded that the use of benzoic acid (4d210) remains safe for the target animals, consumer and for the environment under the approved conditions of the authorisation. Regarding user safety, the additive was considered irritant to skin, eyes and respiratory system and was not considered a potential skin sensitiser. Exposure by any route was considered a risk. There is no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** benzoic acid (PubChem CID 243)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420), Eye Damage (MESH:D005131)
- **Chemicals:** Cr (MESH:D002857), Benzoic acid (MESH:D019817), PCDDs (MESH:D000072317), Dioxins (MESH:D004147), furans (MESH:D005663), -dioxin-like PCBs (-), PCBs (MESH:D011078), benzoates (MESH:D001565), phthalic acid (MESH:C032279), Zn (MESH:D015032), Bi (MESH:D001729), Hg (MESH:D008628), biphenyl (MESH:C010574), As (MESH:D001151), Cd (MESH:D002104), Sn (MESH:D014001), Cu (MESH:D003300), Pb (MESH:D007854), Ag (MESH:D012834), Mn (MESH:D008345), Co (MESH:D003035), Sb (MESH:D000965), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (MESH:D000072338), Fe (MESH:D007501), V (MESH:D014639)
- **Species:** Suidae (boars, family) [taxon 9821], Sus scrofa (pig, species) [taxon 9823]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12928017/full.md

## References

8 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12928017/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12928017