Molecular Biointerface Characterization for an Implanted Medical Device Using Cryogenic Orbitrap Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (Cryo-OrbiSIMS)
Akmal H. Bin Sabri, Kei F. C. Wong, Anna M. Kotowska, Leanne E Fisher, Jeni Luckett, Jimiama M. Mase, Lisa Kämmerling, Grazziela Figueredo, David J. Scurr, Amir M. Ghaemmaghami, Morgan R. Alexander

TL;DR
This study uses advanced imaging techniques to analyze the molecular layers formed around implanted medical devices in mice, revealing insights into the body's response to implants.
Contribution
The work introduces a novel depth profiling approach using Cryo-OrbiSIMS to study the biointerface of implants at a molecular level.
Findings
Elevated sugars and itaconate were observed at 1 day of implantation, indicating early immune response.
Inflammation markers like urate and palmitic acid were detected at 28 days.
Depth profiling revealed distinct molecular layers, with lipids at the implant interface and amino acids/nucleic acids near host tissue.
Abstract
Implanted medical devices often fail due to foreign body reactions (FBRs), a process that is still not fully understood. This work presents a depth profiling approach to provide insight into the spatial metabolomics of the biointerface of implants, revealing biomolecular strata representative of the host response. This study examines silicone rubber poly(dimethylsiloxane) catheters implanted in mice for 1 and 28 days. Cryo-OrbiSIMS was used in combination with ToF-SIMS to identify metabolite profiles from the biological deposit found on the implants after removal from the tissue, which were previously unattainable using tissue sectioning. Machine learning and statistical analysis of the profiles were used to help identify early biointerface responses to the implant, including the observation of elevated sugars and itaconate, an immunomodulatory metabolite that modulates FBR, at 1 day…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
1
2
3
4
5
6- —Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)NA
- —Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)NA
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIon-surface interactions and analysis · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
Introduction
Medical devices play a pivotal role in modern medicine ranging from stents, catheters, hip and knee joints, and sensors to treat and monitor medical conditions or replace and augment physiological functions.? Silicone-based biomaterials are commonly used for medical devices, applied as medical tubing, tissue replacement, intraocular lenses, voice prostheses, dialysis membranes, breast implants, and ventriculoperitoneal shunts. ?,? The response of the body to implants, also known as foreign body response, is described as a complex multistage process characterized by an acute inflammatory phase which is the result of adsorption of biomolecules such as chemoattractant, cytokines, growth factors, and other bioactive agents leading to the formation of a provisional matrix. ?,? This acute FBR phase is also characterized by the recruitment of immune cells such as neutrophils and monocytes to the site of implantation. As the response progresses, the protein within this provisional matrix undergoes a dynamic adsorption–desorption process, known as the Vroman effect, resulting in the replacement of smaller proteins with larger ones. In addition, the recruited monocytes will undergo differentiation into macrophages at the site of implantation, while releasing degrading enzymes and reactive oxygen species. During this period, the fusion of macrophages into polynucleate foreign body giant cells occurs to phagocytose the implanted biomaterial. Overtime, this pro-inflammatory stage transitions into a chronic FBR response characterized by the presence of a fibrotic collagenous layer between the implant and the host tissue. As the FBR transitions into the chronic phase, the macrophages undergo a phenotypic switch from proinflammatory (M1) to anti-inflammatory (M2). These M2 macrophages result in formation of a fibroblast and extracellular matrix-rich capsule that covers and isolates the implant. The surface properties of implant materials (topography, chemistry, compliance) play a critical role in modulating the foreign body response.? The foreign body response typically leads to device failure and necessitates surgical removal over time. Given this limitation, researchers such as Mukherjee et al. have screened and identified novel chemistries that can be used to coat medical-grade silicone catheters, in order to limit this response in mice and nonhuman primates.? The bio-instructive nature of the material raises many mechanistic questions, for which biointerfacial insight is required.
Schreib et al. have proposed new mechanistic insights into the process of foreign body response to implanted medical devices.? Using Bi_3_ ^+^ liquid metal ion gun (LMIG)/ToF-SIMS analysis, the researchers showed that lipid deposition on biomaterials after the first day of implantation correlated with the implant’s immunogenicity, which ultimately dictated the overall foreign body response to the implant. They were able to identify 11 fatty acids, using LMIG/ToF-SIMS analysis, that were enriched on the surface of explanted pro-fibrotic implants and uncoated PDMS disks, while phospholipid and sphingomyelin were enriched on the surface of antifibrotic implants. This correlation, and a potential role for specific lipids in controlling FBR, offers a novel adjunct to the orthodoxy of proteins being the main determinant of response to implants.
The OrbiSIMS has been developed with superior mass resolving power and accuracy, based on the Orbitrap analyzer, along with softer fragmentation using argon gas cluster ion beams (GCIB) to achieve a more comprehensive interpretation of endogenous biomolecular processes, such as response of implants to host tissue, using SIMS. ?,? Suvannapruk et al. applied GCIB/OrbiSIMS to the molecular characterization of sections of tissue proximal to implants to provide information on the in vivo host response to medical device implantation, based on OrbiSIMS metabolite profiling of in vitro single macrophage phenotypes. The molecular characterization of sections of tissue proximal to implants showed that monoacylglycerol (MG) and diacylglycerol (DG) secondary ions from the tissue were seen at increased intensity in the tissues ∼10 μm from the implants of reduced FBR collagen capsule thickness seen in histological sections.? Here, we take the approach of examining the surface of the removed implants using Cryo-OrbiSIMS, rather than analyzing the histological sections, to provide insight into the biointerface.
The mass resolving power and accurate mass of OrbiSIMS data sets provide a rich but complex information source on the molecular structure and fragments from lipids, amino acids, and other small molecules. Manual annotation of Orbi-SIMS data has been used to detect large range of biomolecular species ranging from lipids, amino acids, sugars, peptide fragments, and proteins. ?−? ? There is an impetus to utilize statistical algorithms, such as machine learning, to aid in deconvoluting these complex data sets. The advancement of new complex algorithms for artificial neural networks (ANN) and deep learning architectures underpinned advances in computational hardware.? For instance, several studies have recently been published that demonstrated the utility of machine learning in visualizing and understanding hyperspectral SIMS data sets. ?−? ? Recently, Bamford et al. successfully employed the Self-Organizing Map and Relational Perspective Mapping unsupervised machine learning workflow on ToF-SIMS ion images to identify regions of extracellular vesicles at single pixel resolution released from microglia.?
Here we apply a logistic regression analysis machine learning model coupled with a data-driven multivariate approach to identify and interpret biomolecule changes on the surface of the implanted silicone tubes. Silicone catheters were selected for this study because they represent one of the most widely used indwelling catheter materials in clinical practice, particularly in urinary, peritoneal, and shunts. Their biocompatibility, flexibility, chemical stability, and long clinical history make them an appropriate benchmark for studying the native foreign-body response to a currently deployed medical-grade polymer.? Importantly, silicone catheters are known to induce fibrotic encapsulation over time, which allows us to evaluate tissue–material interactions under clinically relevant conditions. ?,? We probe the inflammatory phase by looking at tubes removed 1 day postimplantation and the early fibrotic phase using samples removed 28 days post implantation to elucidate the cascade of events that takes place during a foreign body response to a silicone implant. Automated peak assignment was achieved using a molecular formula predictor (MFP) to identify the range of biomolecules deposited in combination with established databases.? It was found that cryogenic conditions augmented the signal of biologically relevant molecules from the surface of implants, consistent with previous reports. ?,?,? This methodology and workflow can be translatable to the analysis of novel biomaterials with immune-instructive properties in the search for materials capable of mitigating the FBR response in vivo and offering new insights into the molecular basis of the FBR.
Materials and Methods
In Vivo Study
All of the in vivo study procedures were carried out under full UK Home Office regulations. The procedure was approved and carried out under the following Home Office Licenses (PCD: 50/2505; PPL: PP2870359; PIL: IBCEFDF55; PIL: I34817249). Male Balb/c mice (aged 56–62 days, approximately 25 g) were used in this study. Mice were purchased from a recognized supplier (Charles River Laboratory, UK) and were initially housed in groups of 5 (cage size 500 cm^2^ with sawdust bedding and sizzle nest) according to conditions stipulated by the Home Office. BALB/c mice were selected for this study because they provide a stable, well characterized immune background with moderate inflammatory responsiveness, which is advantageous for isolating device-driven changes at the implant interface. BALB/c mice demonstrate lower pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage activation compared to C57BL/6J mice. This reduced inflammatory baseline prevents excessive, strain-driven fibrosis from overwhelming early biochemical signatures and allows more accurate detection of subtle, device-associated metabolite and lipid signatures, which is central to our mass-spectrometry-based mechanistic analysis of the biointerface.? In addition, BALB/c mice have also been used in biomaterials and FBR research because their immunological profile is predictable and less biased toward exaggerated fibrotic remodelling. ?,? From a methodology perspective, it is important to target a biological system that exhibits a moderate fibrotic-inflammatory response rather than excessive fibrosis/inflammation. Demonstrating the ability to detect subtle changes in BALB/c mice using the current method provides confidence in its sensitivity and supports its utility for identifying more pronounced differences that are expected to be present in other models. This will highlight the usability of the method for identifying metabolic signatures across a spectrum of inflammatory conditions rather than being limited to models of excessive inflammation.
To acclimatize the animals to their surroundings, prior to experimentation, animals were housed for a period of at least 7 days without disturbance, other than to refresh their bedding and to replenish their food and water provisions. Each animal was randomly assigned a code that dictated the implant (or implants) that it received and the form of processing undertaken at the time of harvesting. Animals were anesthetized using inhalation of isoflurane and air, and the dorsum of each mouse was shaved and washed (0.05% aqueous Chlorhexidine Gluconate). The extremes of a 1.0 cm line, dorso-ventral in orientation, were “dot-marked” onto the shaved skin of each flank using a flexible transparent plastic template and an indelible marker pen. Seventy percent alcohol was be applied to the skin immediately prior to incision. A full-thickness incisional wound, 1.0 cm in length, was created by incising the skin between these dot-marks. This incision includes the panniculus carnosus and hypodermis. The free edge of the skin was then lifted, and one subcutaneous pocket was created from each incision with the aid of blunt-nosed scissors. A single piece of catheter with an 12 mm external diameter and a length of 5 mm was wetted with Pharma grade sterile water and inserted into each pocket. Care was taken not to touch the face of the implant materials. Following insertion, the sites were inspected to ensure that samples are located appropriately. After sample insertion, the incisional wounds were closed using nonresorbable sutures.
After biomaterial implantation, the animals were housed individually. Animals were maintained at an ambient temperature of 23 °C with 12 h light/dark cycles and were provided with food and water ad libitum. Following all anesthetic events, animals were placed in a warm environment and were monitored until they fully recovered from the procedure. All animals were provided with appropriate analgesia (vetergesic, [buprenorphine]) after surgery and were provided additional analgesics as required. The mice were administered prophylactic antibiotics (in the form of Enrofloxacin [Baytril], subcutaneous (s.c.)) on the day of wounding and subsequently on every seventh postoperative day. All animal procedures were carried out in a Home Office licensed establishment under the following Home Office Licenses (PCD: 50/2505; PPL: PP2870359; PIL: IBCEFDF55; PIL: I34817249). The health status of animals was monitored within 2 h of implantation, daily for the first 7 days, and weekly thereafter.
Animals were monitored daily for the first 7 days to ensure that sutures remained in place; sutures were removed on day 7. Animals were then maintained for a further 21 days until postimplantation day 28. At 1 day or 28 days postimplantation, animals were humanely killed by a UK Home Office compliant method. Following confirmation of death, each animal was rapidly dissected and all implantation sites harvested. Excised implants were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and shipped on dry ice (−80 °C). Implantation sites for histological investigation were fixed (10% neutral buffered formalin, Sigma, UK) and processed into paraffin wax. Excised tissue was sandwiched between two pieces of foam prior to being placed in a fixative to reduce the extent of tissue curling. Fixed specimens were trimmed and dissected in a cranio-caudal direction, generating two half sites (Figure). The dorsal half was processed and embedded in paraffin wax (the remaining half was stored in 70% EtOH). Specimens were orientated in such a fashion as to ensure that appropriate transverse sections of the implantation sites were taken. Six micrometer sections were taken, processed, and stained with H&E. In addition, the sections were stained using Picrosirius Red Stain (Polysciences, Hirschberg, Germany) and Masson’s Trichrome Stain (Polysciences, Hirschberg, Germany) kits. The images of the stained sections were acquired using Axioscan 7 from Zeis. This was done using tiled sequential acquisition with flash bright field at 20x objective. For section stained using Picrosirius Red, the image was also acquired using polarized light. Inflamed area measurement was done by taking macroscopic images of explanted skin tissue which were pinned down to flatten out the skin. ImageJ was utilized to analyze the area of inflammation surrounding the catheter segments by thresholding the color change observed in the skin tissue.
(a) Schematic illustrating the subcutaneous implantation of silicone catheter into male Balb/c mice. (b) Images of the implanted catheter in the subcutaneous layer of mice at 1 day and 28 days, scale bar: 0.25 mm. (c) Area of reddened tissue (indicated by arrow) showing inflammation surrounding the catheter following implantation along with the presence of vascularization. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5 for 1 day, n = 11 for 28 days). (d) Masson trichrome and polarized Picrosirius red staining and of FBR tissue sections at 28 days, scale bar: 1 mm. (e) Cellular and collagen layer thickness measured from histological sections.
Sample Preparation and Cryo-OrbiSIMS Analysis
Excised implants were carefully removed using a clear pair of forceps from the animal. A pair of isopropyl alcohol sterilized forceps were used to carefully used to grab the edge of the catheter during removal. This was done to avoid touching the middle of the cylindrical catheter, as this will be the region by which analysis will be conducted. During this process, the subcutaneous tissue that was attached to the skin was peeled from the catheter at 180° axially to the tube, without touching the surface of the catheter. This revealed the strongly adhered biointerfacial deposits that have delaminated from the surrounding tissue. This surface was not washed or treated with any chemical and was immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and shipped on dry ice (−80 °C). The catheters were stored at −80 °C until analysis. Prior to cryo-OrbiSIMS analysis, the samples were thawed at room temperature for 2 min. This is to enable the sample to be sliced in half and laid flat on a cryo-manipulation station. The implant consisted of a PDMS catheter with a 12 mm external diameter and 5 mm length. The surface of the catheter is smooth and consists of a thin film of biological deposit with a watery appearance that was formed following implantation into the animal. To mount the catheter onto the cryo-stage, a pair of clean forceps were inserted into the internal diameter of the catheter to carefully hold the implant, and a pair of sterilize scalpels were used to slice into the middle of the cylinder to cut the implant in halves. Both halves of the catheter were carefully transferred onto the cryo stage by holding the edge of the catheter; this is done to avoid contaminating the surface of the catheter prior to analysis. The samples were adhered to the cryo-manipulation station using a thin layer of OCT glue. Using a pair of forceps, the samples were then snap frozen using liquid nitrogen. Before measurement by cryo-OrbiSIMS, samples were placed in a cryo-manipulation station, Leica EM VCM (Leica, Germany), from where they were transferred to the cryo-OrbiSIMS using a shuttle chamber Leica EM VCT500 (Leica, Germany).
The cryo-OrbiSIMS is equipped with a fully proportional–integral–derivative (PID) temperature controller, which controls resistive heating. This setup also incorporates a direct liquid nitrogen (LN2) closed loop circulation cooling stage to enable the sample to be thermoregulated under cryogenic conditions within the load lock and main chamber. The instrument is installed with a cryogenic storage tank where LN2 was pumped for circulating the cooling medium through vacuum feedthroughs to a cooling finger below the sample, allowing fast cooling to −180 °C with a stability of ±1–2 °C for at least 7 days. Mass calibration of the Q Exactive instrument was performed once a day using silver cluster ions. Electrons with an energy of 21 eV and a current of −10 μA and argon gas flooding were used for charge compensation. The surface of the catheter is curved. Analysis was conducted along the length of the catheter and avoided at the edge of the catheter where it was in contact with forceps. ToF-SIMS analysis was conducted prior to the OrbiSIMS data analysis. For ToF-SIMS images, the data were acquired using a Bi_3_ ^+^ cluster source with a primary ion energy of 30 keV, and the primary ion dose was preserved below 1 × 10^12^ per cm^2^ to ensure static conditions. The ToF-SIMS analysis was performed over an analysis area of 500 μm × 500 μm. For all Orbitrap data, mass spectral information was collected from a mass range of 80 to 1200 Da. The Orbitrap analyzer was operated in positive-ion and negative-ion mode at the 240,000 at m/z 200 mass-resolution setting (512 ms transient time). The GCIB OrbiSIMS resulted in consumption of the material on the surface of the catheter over 100 scans, for a total ion dose of 1.29 × 10^14^. A total of 30 technical replicates across three animals per time point was acquired. The technical replicates per animal per time point was acquired along the length of the catheter in order to capture as much chemical information present on the surface of the catheters as possible. Each OrbiSIMS analysis was conducted using sawtooth raster mode with a crater size of 181.1 × 181.1 μm, which equates to a field of analysis of 100 × 100 μm. Per time point, a total of n = 30 technical replicates was acquired across N = 3 animals. For replicate N1 for both time points, a total of n = 6 technical replicates was run as this was the preliminary replicate. For N2 and N3 for both time points, a total of n = 12 technical replicates was acquired.
OrbiSIMS Peak Assignment
IonToF SurfaceLab 7.1.116182 was used to process the results and create the peak lists for export. Chemical filtering via SIMS–molecular formula predictor (MFP) was done via calculating the possible chemical formula permutation based on elemental restrictions from secondary ion data, including that obtained from a depth profile analysis. The elemental limitation was applied for secondary ion assignment: C [4–150], H [2–250], N [0–30], O [0–20], S [0–1], P [0–2], Na [0–1], K [0–1], and Cl [0–1]. The double bond equivalence was set between −10 to 50. All possible chemical formulas were within the mass deviation of ±5 ppm below m/z 95 and ±2 ppm above m/z 95. All the predicted formulas were filtered based on the Human Metabolome and LIPID MAPS databases.
Putative assignments were made using a Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) filter based upon secondary ion accurate masses, mz. Lipid putative assignments were made using a computationally generated bulk lipid database from LIPIDMAPS based upon secondary ions accurate masses, mz. These assignments are used to provide a subclass assignment, but the exact structures are not quoted since we do not have MS data. Some of these assignments may also result from fragmentation of larger species.
Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
IONTOF SurfaceLab software was used to export the data into a BIF 6 file format. For each data set, Surface Lab 7.2 (IONTOF GmbH) was used to perform an automated peak search on the total spectra restricted only to peaks with intensities above 100 au. Peak intensities were then exported for each observation. Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) was performed using the simsMVA software. Prior to NMF, data were Poisson scaled to account for nonuniform noise across the mass spectra. NMF with three factors was achieved using a Poisson-based multiplicative update rule algorithm. The number of factors was chosen based on principal component analysis of a compressed matrix of the original data set. A total of 500 iterations was conducted per data set.
Depth Profile
Analysis Estimation
Information from published depth profiling of organic molecular standards (Irganox 1010)? was used to estimate the depth of GCIB depth profiling. This was based on information from primary ion dose of the GCIB, explained in detail in Molecular Depth Profiling and Biointerfacial Characterization Using OrbiSIMS. The sputter yield from 20 keV Ar_3000_ ^+^ on Irganox 1010 was adjusted for the cryogenic condition (−170 °C) used in this study. This was done by comparing to the literature values using the calculations developed by Seah et al.? as used previously by Kotowska et al.? The depth profile was normalized to the maximum intensity of the each species in order for us to easily gauge the trend in profile of respective species as a function of depth. In addition, the profile was averaged over 10 scans per data point, as previously reported, ?,? in order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and gauge the trend in chemical species as a function of depth.
Machine Learning of Cryo-OrbiSIMS Data
Machine learning was explored to automate the discovery of deposited biomolecular species and to better understand the deposition within 1 and 28 days of implantation. Two data sets of biomolecule deposition from the negative and positive ion spectra were analyzed, consisting of n = 30 technical replicates across N = 3 biological replicates per time point. Their biomolecular species intensities were identified using secondary ion mass spectrometry coupled to an Orbitrap mass analyzer. The samples were scaled to intensity values between 0 and 1 to avoid numerical instability in the machine learning training process, where 0 represents the lowest intensity in the data set and 1 represents the highest intensity. Machine learning approaches (Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost, and logistic regression) were trained using Helix.? Logistic regressiona more interpretable, linear machine learning (ML) and statistical approachyielded overall good fit, comparable to nonlinear approaches and more interpretable results. It is a statistical method for predicting the probability of a binary outcome, such as the presence of biomolecular species at 1 and 28 days, based on predictor variables, such as the intensities of biomolecular species. It employs a multivariate linear regression function to learn the relationship between the outcome and predictors, followed by a logistic function (Sigmoid function) to map the learned relationship to a probability range of 0 to 1. This method is valuable for interpreting the impact of predictor variables indicated by regression coefficients, especially in cases where the outcome is binary. To gain deeper insights into the variables identified as important by both linear and nonlinear models, we also employed more complex, nonlinear ML methods for comparison with logistic regression. Post hoc interpretability analyses (using SHAP and another ensemble of interpretation approaches implemented in Helix?) were then conducted to assess whether the salient features identified by logistic regression aligned with those revealed by nonlinear models. Our intention was to either validate the initial findings or uncover supporting information regarding OrbiSIMS-derived variables that exhibit nonlinear associations with the outcome, thereby aiding in the discrimination between 24 h and 28 day profiles. To facilitate the identification of the most informative predictors, we applied Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regularization prior to model development for variable selection. This procedure reduced the dimensionality of the input space by limiting the number of independent variables, thus mitigating the risk of overfitting across both linear and nonlinear models. Evaluation on an independent test setfollowing cross-validation on the training setindicates that the models generalize well, suggesting that overfitting is unlikely to have occurred. Additional details on the machine learning methodologies and output are detailed in the Supporting Information.
Results and Discussion
Histology
Sections of silicone catheters were implanted subcutaneously into male Balb/c mice, as shown in Figure(a). Upon implant removal after 1 day, there were no visible differences in the surrounding tissue, as seen in Figure(b), but a transparent film was apparent on the surface of the material. After 28 days of implantation, a significant area of reddening was observed in the surrounding tissue, as well as the presence of vascularization believed to be indicative of prolonged inflammation at the site. This reddened tissue area was quantified in Figure(c) by using ImageJ to analyze the area of inflammation surrounding the catheter segments by thresholding the color change observed in the skin tissue. Histology performed on the tissue both surrounding and within the catheter tube is shown in Figure(d). The catheters were removed post fixation and prior to embedding during sample processing. The tissue surrounding the implants after 28 days were stained using three separate complementary approaches, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson’s trichrome (MT), and Picrosirius red stains (bright field and polarized light), in order to get a full characterization of the tissue. The results of all three stainings are shown in Figure S1. A fibrotic layer is clearly indicated by the MT stain in Figure(d) around the catheter at 28 days, consistent with an FBR.? The polarized Picrosirius red stain along with the Masson’s trichrome stain clearly reveals a cellular layer on the implant side of the fibrous layer Figure(d). Previous reports? have considered these two layers as one collective strata, i.e., the entire fibrotic biolayer; however, these images show that this can be further subcategorized. The cellular layer was measured using seven samples as 6 ± 1 μm, and the collagen layer was 16 ± 5 μm Figure(e).
Biointerfacial Chemical Analysis
To study the molecular response of the host to the implant at an interfacial level, GCIB OrbiSIMS analysis of the samples was conducted on the surface of the explanted silicone catheter, resulting in consumption of the material at the interface over a 100 analysis scans. Samples need to be examined either frozen hydrated using cryogenics or dehydrated at room temperature to allow them to be placed under a vacuum for SIMS analysis. The implant consisted of a PDMS catheter with 12 mm external diameter and 5 mm length. The surface of the removed catheter was visually smooth with a watery appearance upon removal from the tissue. To mount the catheter onto the cryo-stage, a pair of clean forceps were inserted into the internal diameter of the catheter to carefully hold the implant, and a pair of sterilized scalpels were used to slice into the middle of the cylinder to cut the implant in half. The half catheter was carefully transferred onto the cryo stage and held by the edge. The surface of the catheter is curved, and analysis was conducted along the length of the catheter and avoided at the edge of the catheter where it was in contact with forceps during transfer.
We compared these two approaches; the physical effect of the sample drying under vacuum at room temperature was seen as cracks in the LMIG/ToF-SIMS images in Figure(a), where water evaporation has led to shrinkage and fracture of the biomolecular layer. When the samples were analyzed under cryogenic frozen-hydrated conditions, no cracking was observed. Figure(b) illustrates an example of an OrbiSIMS spectrum that was acquired under frozen hydrated conditions in comparison to that acquired at room temperature. Plotting the intensities of the ions acquired from the room temperature samples against those acquired under cryogenic conditions in Figure(c) clearly reveals that employing cryo-GCIB/OrbiSIMS augments the ion signal intensity for approximately 90% of ions, some by as much as 1 × 10^4^. Furthermore, more than 40 biomolecular species were only detected under cryo, including ions putatively assigned to a diacyl-glycerophosphoethanolamine, PE 36:1, a diacyl-glycerophosphoinositol, PI 38:5, glutamine and the oxidized fatty acyl molecules such as NAT 32:0;O4 and NAT 32:7;O. The augmented ionization yield is attributed to the presence of water that serves as a matrix to provide H^+^ transfer for secondary ion formation. Furthermore, cryogenic analysis prevents loss of molecules that are prone to evaporation such as fatty acyls, so frozen hydrated acquisition is adopted for the rest of the work in this paper. ?,? It has recently been shown that performing OrbiSIMS analysis under cryogenic conditions enhances molecular stability during SIMS analysis by reducing molecular fragmentation and suppressing ion-beam-induced damage, in agreement with previous literature.? Cryogenic conditions can introduce artifacts such as ice crystal formation, altered ionization efficiency, or redistribution of analytes.? This is especially true for thick biological tissue or cross sections, where the presence of ice crystals due to slow freezing can introduce fissures and holes in the specimen due to expansion of water upon freezing. In our study, we took several measures to mitigate these issues. The samples consisted of a very thin layer of biological deposits that was rapidly frozen using plunge freezing to minimize ice crystal formation and preserve native spatial distribution.
*(a) LMIG/ToF-SIMS ion images of the catheter surfaces when samples were analyzed under frozen hydrated and room temperature conditions. (b) Comparison of GCIB/OrbiSIMS spectra of catheter surfaces analyzed under frozen hydrated (blue) and room temperature (red) conditions. (c) Scatter plot comparing the normalized ion intensities of biomolecules detected when the surface of the catheters was analyzed under room temperature and frozen hydrated. (d) Non-negative matrix factor (NMF) loadings showing the separation of LMIG/ToF-SIMS data into three distinct components: ice, biological deposition, and catheter. (e) Representative NMF images for 1 and 28 days of implantation following 500 NMF iterations. The NMF analysis was performed using loadings and images from raw LMIG/ToF data sets. Color scale represents the intensity of NMF endmembers post calculation along with the ion images for C5H15NPO4 +, which represent phosphatidylcholine fragments and SiC3H9
- and Si2C5H15O+, a marker for PDMS. Scale bar: 100 μm. A red-green color-blind alternative of Figure (e) is also available in Figure S9.*
To enable the interpretation of imaging mass spectral data sets generated in ToF-SIMS analysis, non-negative matrix factorization (NMF)? analysis was employed, as shown in Figure(d). This revealed that the surface of the segments were very chemically heterogeneous, as shown in Figure(e), with patchy biological deposit on the silicone tube. NMF images categorized the lateral chemical variance into three distinct surface chemistries along the surface of the catheter: secondary ion fragment representing the silicone from the catheter, ice, and biological deposit at 1 day and 28 days. Contributions to these were ions representative of the silicone catheter and mobile oligomers using m/z 73.05 (SiC_3_H_9_ ^+^), 147.06 (Si_2_C_5_H_15_O^+^), and 207.03 (Si_3_C_5_H_15_O_3_ ^+^), ice where water clusters H_7_O_3_ ^+^, H_9_O_4_ ^+^, and H_11_O_5_ ^+^ from H_2n+1_O_ n _ ^+^ ? were observed, and biological deposits containing phosphatidylcholine fragment ions and salts: 86.10 (C_5_H_12_N^+^), 184.06 (C_5_H_15_NPO_4_ ^+^), 22.99 (Na^+^), and 38.96 (K^+^). In Figure(e) and Figure S11, it is apparent that there was a greater coverage of biological deposit on the silicone surface at 28 days relative to 1 day. Displaying selected individual ion images in Figure(e) shows that the biological deposit sits as discontinuous patches on the catheter (m/z 73.05) at 1 day. At 28 days large regions of biological deposit are seen as islands, which on some replicates become the dominant continuous phase in Figures S11 and S12, replicate 1. The biodeposit phase represented by C_5_H_15_NPO_4_ ^+^ at the surface of the PDMS arises from the delamination of the tissues during the 180° peel of the tissue away from the catheter, which exposed this interface critical to gaining insight into the response of the host to the implant.
From this observation, we can see that silicone-based catheters do result in greater deposition of molecules at the biointerface over time, consistent with the collagenous capsule formation in addition to more subtle molecular changes. It is generally regarded that hydrophobic polymers such as PDMS develop stronger FBR than hydrophilic polymers. ?,? Given this limitation, new strategies are being explored to reduce FBR and the likelihood of infection through strategies such as the incorporation of polymeric ?,? or nanoparticulate ?,? coatings on the surface of these catheters.
Cryo-OrbiSIMS Biomolecular
Deposit Spectral Annotation
The Human Metabolome and computational LIPID MAPS databases was used to help assign the peaks from the OrbiSIMS analysis. [M + Na]^+^, [M+K]^+^, and [M+Cl]^−^ were used to undertake an untargeted analysis of the biomolecular deposit captured in the cryo-OrbiSIMS spectra using the molecular formula prediction (MFP) approach.? Figure(a) illustrates an example of an annotated OrbiSIMS spectra following MFP assignment. The peak search of the GCIB/OrbiSIMS spectra resulted in identification of 4922 secondary ion peaks in the negative polarity and 1458 peaks in the positive polarity, as shown in Figure(b). From this, we were able to putatively assign 90 lipid molecular ion peaks, 17 of which are fatty acids peaks. It is likely that these fatty acid peaks may arise as fragment ions from larger lipid molecular ion peak. In addition, we were able to assign 214 metabolites molecular ions on the surface of the silicone catheters using the HMDB filter. Consistent with the greater area of biological deposit observed in the ToF-SIMS images, it was observed that there were more metabolites and lipids detected on the surface of the tube at 28 days relative to 1 day.
(a) Comparison of cryo-GCIB/Orbi-SIMS spectra of silicone catheter surface at 1 day and 28 days. (b) Table summarizing the total number of peaks detected across the catheter surface at 1 day and 28 days along with the number of lipid and metabolite unique peaks.
Identifying Significant Assignments Using
a Logistic Regression Machine Learning Algorithm
To determine if we could better extract data from the OrbiSIMS data sets of the whole biointerface with machine learning, we employed a linear logistic regression and other nonlinear machine learning models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), on the assigned metabolites. The model aims to predict the difference between two classes (samples measured after 1 or 28 days post implantation). The machine learning model was applied to all putatively assigned biomolecular species under each condition and from both positive and negative polarity combined. The details of the methodology and output of all the machine learning models that were ran for these data sets are detailed in the Supporting Information (Figures S2–S6 and Tables S3–S5). Overall, the results throughout all models were consistent, with the best results obtained by Logistic Regression, using 5-fold cross validation and 20% of the data as a holdout test set. The workflow highlighted in Figure shows the supervised machine learning method using logistic regression. The logistic regression-based machine learning model highlighted that there were 54 assigned species that were critical in differentiating the interfacial response between explanted catheters at 1 day and 28 days. The statistical significance of these metabolites was tested using a simple unpaired Student’s t test and tabulated in Table S5. This analysis revealed that 79.6% of the species identified by the machine learning model were statistically significant, p < 0.05. The tabulated metabolites in Table S5 also displayed mean coefficient values, with negative values being more associated with metabolites that are predictive of 1 day response, while the more positive coefficients were associated with the 28 day response. Interestingly, the top two phenotypic metabolite predictors for 1 day postimplantation are the glycerophosphoglycerol PG 39:1;O and linoleic acid FA 18:2, which suggests that these lipids are strongly associated with the surface of the catheter upon initial implantation or may be continually produced by the cells associated with the implant surface. These lipids may form the initial lipid layer on the surface of the catheter, for example from local cell extracellular vesicles as proposed by Schreib et al.?
Schematic of the data analysis workflow along logistic regression-based machine learning to identify metabolites that are important in differentiating implanted catheters at 1 day and 28 days from peak assignment that have been filtered through the Human Metabolome Database and computational LipidMAPS filtered database.
Fold Change and Statistical Significance
In addition to machine learning, we have used a volcano plot to help interpret the complex Orbi-SIMS data set from the biointerface. These are useful in comparing two sample types with a large number of data components, replicates, and dynamic range. We display the mean ion intensity from n = 30 replicate analyses on a plot of log_10_ *p-*value determined between the two implant time points versus the fold change over time on a log_2_ scale in Figure(a). Secondary ions were normalized to the MFP derived species for their respective group total. This was done to minimize the impact of any variability in secondary ions between samples from other chemical species. ?,? It was observed that there were 61 metabolites that are of statistically significant higher concentration (p < 0.05, fold change ≥ 2) at 1 day. These include myo-inositol and several sugar isomers. For 28 days of implantation, we observed 15 metabolites that are expressed at a statistically significant higher concentration that include known markers of inflammation such as FA 14:0.? It was observed that the urate levels on the surface of the catheters from 1 day to 28 days was seen to remain the same (p > 0.05), suggesting sustained inflammation in the tissues surrounding the catheter. Urate is a known end product for the metabolism of purines, the main constituents of nucleotides.? During the FBR cascade, urate, particularly in it is crystalline form, has been reported to promote a pro-inflammatory response through the innate immune system, leading to inflammation and potential tissue damage.?
(a) Volcano plot of biomolecular species detected on the surface of catheters at 1 day and 28 days. Highlighted in the plot are some of the species that displayed a 2-fold difference in species concentration with a statistical significance of p < 0.05. The volcano plot was constructed using FDR-corrected p-values from a t test to determine statistical significance. For species plotted, the data are expressed as the average of all technical replicates, n = 30. (b) Bar charts of selected biomolecules. Data are plotted as normalized ion intensities to total metabolite/lipid content. Data are displayed as n = 30, mean ± SD, following nonparametric t test with a statistical significance of p < 0.05. Nonparametric t test was chosen because the data did not display a normal distribution following Shapiro–Wilk and Kolgomorov–Smirnov tests. The output of the normality tests is detailed in Table S3.
Sugars such as fructose and glucose as well as metabolites that play key regulatory role in glycolysis such as itaconate and mesaconate ?,? are found to be significantly higher on the surface of the silicone catheter on day 1 relative to 28 days in Figure(a)–(b). These biomolecules were also identified by the logistic regression-based machine learning algorithm to be predictive of phenotypic response toward silicone catheter surfaces at 1 day, as shown in Table S5. This observation is consistent with the kinetics of an inflammatory response.? During the early phase of an inflammatory response, the damaged tissue and its periphery, in this case the surface of the catheter, will experience a burst of itaconate. This molecule has been extensively reported to play a role in regulating and limiting the local inflammatory response, which in turn prevents further damage to the tissue should there be any sustained inflammation. ?,? Itaconate is produced by activated macrophages and serves as an immunometabolite that modulates FBR by inhibiting succinate dehydrogenase while simultaneously activating NRF2 and ATF3.? These effects collectively suppress NF-κB signaling, which reduces pro-fibrotic macrophage activation. The immunomodulatory role of itaconate was further reinforced by a recent work that showed implants that are loaded with itaconate and citrate displayed reduced foreign body response on the surface of implanted cardiac patches.? In addition, mesaconate and itaconate are constitutional (structural) isomers, since they share the same molecular formula but differ in atomic connectivity. Both molecules are related dicarboxylic acids and are both intermediates in metabolic pathways, particularly in microbial and mammalian systems. Despite these differences, they displayed similar anti-inflammatory effects, possibly via overlapping the NRF2 activation and cytokine suppression pathway.? As the inflammation subsides, itaconate levels also decrease, as shown in our analysis at 28 days in Figure(b), reflecting the reduced need for immune suppression. Overall, both itaconate and mesaconate are emerging immunomodulatory metabolites, with growing recognition of their roles in the cascade of immune regulatory events during the foreign body response.
The sugar molecules identified in the analysis are linked to inflammatory processes particularly in macrophages through the pentose phosphate pathway or via glycolysis.? Viola et al. and Liu et al. have discussed how macrophages switch to glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway to produce energy, which helps augment cellular pro-inflammatory responses during an inflammatory response. ?,? In addition, it has also been shown recently how both itaconate and mesaconate exert anti-inflammatory effects in pro-inflammatory macrophages and play a role in inhibiting glycolysis.? A significant decrease in l-glutamine on the surface of the catheter from 1 day to 28 days was seen in Figure(b), suggesting the utilization of the amino acids via catabolic processes that drives inflammation. l-Glutamine, which is one of the most abundant amino acids in the human body, has also been linked to inflammation via glutaminolysis.? An increase in saturated fatty acids deposition, FA 14:0 and FA 16:0, was highlighted at 28 days relative to 1 day. These fatty acids have been studied extensively and have been shown to be linked to an increase in inflammation ?,? as well as lipid-induced cellular apoptosis. ?,? FA 16:0, also known as palmitic acid, is not inherently a TLR agonist. However, upon entering cells, FA 16:0 can be converted into phospholipids, diacylglycerols, and ceramides, which then leads to activation of various signaling pathways that are common for LPS-mediated TLR4 activation, culminating in an inflammatory response. In particular, metabolic products of palmitic acid affect the activation of various protein kinases C and endoplasmic reticulum stress and cause an increase in ROS generation that promotes further inflammation.? In addition, FA 14:0, which is also known as myristic acid, has been reported to exacerbate and promote further inflammation, particularly in the presence of FA 16:0. ?,?
Comparison of Data Mining Methods
A comparison of utility of the machine learning and volcano plot approaches in identifying the species associated with the catheter at 1 day and 28 days shows that up to 37% of the metabolites identified by logistic regression-based machine learning overlapped with the conventional univariate approach in Figure S2. The ensemble of both methodologies, by machine learning and univariate statistical analysis, increases the confidence in the results, as multiple perspectives of importance of the variables are taken into consideration, both looking at individual importance and how variables can be important synergistically. Each methodology identified unique species, with the machine learning highlighting a narrower selection of metabolites relative to volcano plot analysis. The narrower metabolite list is attributed to Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) feature selection prior to machine learning. LASSO zeros the beta coefficients of those variables that are not significant to the outcome, after which logistic regression-based machine learning was performed on the 54 variables to enable the metabolites to be ranked based on their contributions at 1 and 28 days. This feature removal obviates the contribution of metabolites that had very little influence in the ranking. Since there are potentially useful species identified uniquely by each approach, we propose that they should be used in concert to help deconvolute the complex OrbiSIMS data set.
Molecular Depth Profiling and Biointerfacial Characterization
Using OrbiSIMS
To elucidate the identity of this biointerfacial deposit as a function of depth, GCIB/OrbiSIMS depth profiles were conducted and are shown for selected ions in Figure(a). Metabolites that showed the highest signal intensity at the start of the profile and decrease as a function of dose of primary ion beam and depth are categorized as species which were next to the cells in the H&E sections before removal from the tissue (Figure(d)). These are known as metabolites located at the cellular interface. Species that display higher intensity later in the depth profile are categorized to originate from the material–host interface at the implant surface; these are known as metabolites distant from the cellular interface. Nonlipid metabolites such amino acids and nucleic acid bases were concentrated at the surface of the deposit and are in close contact with the host–tissue interface. In contrast, lipids such as diacylglycerophosphoglycerol, PG 39:1;O, and oxidized glycosphingolipid, SHexCer 41:5;O5 are buried deeper in the deposit and are located more closely with the surface of the implant itself. The schematic in Figure(b) illustrates the presence of biological deposits formed on the surface of the catheters, while the putative structures of these metabolites identified in the depth profile are shown in Figure(c).
(a) Depth profile of silicone catheter surfaces implanted for 28 days versus primary ion dose (ions/cm2) and estimated depth displaying lipids, amino acids, and nucleic acid bases. Molecules present at the interface of the deposit and the tissue (close to the surface) are categorized as interfacial, while those present deep in the deposit away from the surface are categorized as distant from the interface. The secondary x-axis presents depth estimated by comparison with organic standards. (b) Schematic illustration summarizing the presence of biological deposits formed on the surface of medical devices following implantation. (c) Chemical structure of species detected by cryo-OrbiSIMS. A red-green color-blind alternative of Figure is also available in Figure S10.
The surface of the explanted tubes, which was next to the cellular layer seen in the histology, was characterized by a number of metabolites, thymine, uracil, adenine, cytosine, guanine, l-proline, and inositol cyclic phosphate, which we assume are related to cells. Some lipids were also found at this interface, including icosatetraenoic acid and the glycerophosphoinositol PI (38:4). These lipid classes have been shown to be involved in a variety of biological processes and are key markers for plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum. ?,? It was seen in Table S5 that oxidized diacylglycerophosphoglycerol, PG 39:1;O, and fatty acid, linoleic acid FA 18:2, species were ranked by a logistic regression-based machine learning algorithm as biomolecules that are mostly associated with the surface of the implants at 1 day. It can therefore be postulated that these lipid species may form an initial lipid deposit that is closely associated with the surface of the catheter upon implantation. The presence of these initial lipids on the surface of the catheter may arise from the deposition of the lipid from surrounding tissue due to the initial implantation procedure. Over time, other lipid species and metabolites are deposited onto the lipid layers, resulting in the formation of stratified lipid deposit layers. Overall, this work showed that the use of cryo-OrbiSIMS and machine learning provides us the tools needed to uncover the different layers of lipids and metabolites that make up the biointerface which reflects the molecular history of the implant.
Comparison with SIMS Literature on Implants
In this study, it was discovered that more biomolecules were detected in the negative polarity (247 metabolites) relative to the positive polarity, which only detected 45 metabolites. This corroborates what was previously observed by Touboul et al. and Angerer et al., who detected more lipid species such as phosphoinositols, fatty acids, and triglycerides in murine and human tissue sections in negative polarity relative to positive polarity analysis. ?,? The complete list of MFP filtered and assigned peaks with reference to assignment databases is presented in Tables S1–S2. The higher spectral and mass resolving power of cryo-OrbiSIMS and the GCIB primary beam has enabled us to detect and assign more biomolecular species on the surface of implants following extraction relative to the study conducted by Schreib et al.? Machine learning in combination with univariate statistical analysis has enabled us to narrow down the contribution of important biomolecular species at the two time points of implant analysis. We showed that sugar-based molecules at 1 day were key features identified on the surface of the implant, while lipid species such as fatty acids and urate were more important features at 28 days that indicate the presence of inflammation at the site of implant.
Previous work by Schreib et al. dissected and retrieved PDMS disks implanted in the intraperitoneal space of C57BL/6 mice, known to have a different immune profile compared to BALB/c mice. The BALB/c mouse strain, used in the current work, displays a more Th2 biased response in contrast to the C57bl/6 strain, which is more skewed toward a Th1 response.? For their PDMS implant, Schreib et al. reported a fibrotic collagen capsule of 33 ± 6 μm in thickness 28 days after implantation (n = 3) into the intraperitoneal space. In the subcutaneous site from which our implants were retrieved, the collagen thickness was found to be thinner, 16 + 5 μm at 28 days of implantation in BALB/c mice. These differences in collagen capsule thickness measured may be attributed to the different shape and size of implants used, different implantation sites, and the differences in fibrotic response expressed by the C57BL/6 mouse strain relative to the BALB/c mice used in the current work. These differences may result in the formation of a different FBR capsule with distinct structure along with different levels of cell infiltration into the capsule relative to our current work. Schreib et al. reported no adhesion of the collagenous capsule to the explants, and a sparse cell distribution on the implant surface as visualized by microscopy. Our Masson’s trichrome staining allowed us to identify the presence of a cellular layer at the interface between the implant site and the fibrous capsule. Due to the complex immune and cellular cascade that takes place between silicone-based implants and the host tissue, these cellular layers shown in Figure(d) may consist of a variety of cells ranging from monocytes, macrophages, T-cells, and fibroblasts.?
Schreib et al. observed that the cells were surrounded by patches of molecules that contained the same secondary ion signatures as the plasma membrane. They suggested that this observation may be attributed to the cells leaving parts of their membrane on the surface of the disk upon contact and/or extracellular vesicles secreted from these sparsely distributed cells. With cryo-OrbiSIMS, we have been able to identify icosatetraenoic acid and glycerophosphoinositol PI (38:4), which are key markers for plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum. ?,? The presence of this lipid may arise from the host cell layer, as illustrated in Figure(b), depositing part of their membrane upon contact with the implant. It is worth noting the depth profile of the implant surface at 1 day showed that most of the nucleic acid bases are located deeper in the deposition away from the interface layer compared to 28 days. The presence of the nucleic acid may arise from the deposition of cellular residue such as through extracellular vesicle-associated DNA from the surrounding cells coming in close contact with the surface during the early phases of the implantation.? Also, the interface layer at 1 day consisted mostly of sugar isomers and their respective metabolites, as shown in Figure S8 and Table S6. The enrichment of sugars and metabolites at the interfacial layers may be attributed to an increase in demand for energy particularly by macrophages and neutrophils at the implant site during the early inflammatory response.? This early inflammation is also a result of the disruption of cell structures due to the implantation procedure of the catheter into the subcutaneous pocket. We have highlighted that there is an increase in itaconate at the surface of the implant at 1 day vs 28 days. The depth profile data from Figure S8 and Table S6 showed that the molecule is spatially mostly located on the outermost layer of the deposit, near the interfacial layer. The presence of this anti-inflammatory molecule at the outermost layer of the deposits may serve as an to limit the inflammation at the site of the implant and mitigate further damage to the periphery tissue.
Our GCIB/OrbiSIMS depth profile also showed that the outermost layer detected on the surface of the implant is enriched in lipids, most of which are fatty acids, FA 16:0, FA 18:0, and FA 18:1, and icosatetraenoic acid at 28 days. This observation is consistent with Schreib et al., who reported the enrichment of fatty acid on the surface of the PDMS disk upon implantation into C57BL/6 mice at 1 day? using static LMIG ToF-SIMS analysis to analyze the surface lipid layer on their implant. However, due to the limited spectral resolution of ToF-SIMS, they were unable to identify any molecular ions from other lipid and nonlipid species on the surface of their implant. In this study, with the aid of the Orbitrap analyzer, we were also able to show that this interfacial layer is not only enriched with fatty acids but also contains nucleic acid bases such as guanine, adenine, and cytosine. The DNA base adenine has been widely used as a nuclear cell marker for LMIG/ToF-SIMS and GCIB/Orbi-SIMS analysis. ?,? The presence of uracil, which is only present on the surface, indicates the presence of RNA while the presence of thymine is an indicator that DNA is also present on the surface of the tubes in Figure(a). In addition, due to inherent depth profiling capability of the Orbi-SIMS, we are also able to probe the presence of additional lipid species that may be present beneath this fatty acid enriched surface. Beneath this fatty acid enrich layer, we also showed the presence of other lipid species such as diacylglycerophosphoglycerol (PG 39:1;O), oxidized glycosphingolipid (SHexCer 41:5;O5), glycerophosphoinositol monophosphate (PIP 39:5), and the unsaturated linoleic acid FA 18:2. This indeed builds upon the lipid hypothesis proposed Schreib et al. that lipid deposition on the surface of biomaterial can play a critical role in biomaterial-induced foreign body reaction and fibrosis. However, this lipid deposition is not a homogeneous lipid layer but instead consists of layers of stratified lipid species. The ability to identify this stratified lipid layer was only achievable by the use of cryo-GCIB/Orbi-SIMS analysis, which enables the preservation of this lipid layer in a near native state during data acquisition.
Conclusions
Cryo-OrbiSIMS using an argon GCIB to obtain high mass resolving power has been utilized to depth profile the biological deposit formed on the surface of silicone catheters implanted in mice at 1 day and 28 days. SIMS-MFP and a logistic regression machine learning model have allowed the identification and characterization of this complex biomolecular layer that consist of biomolecules of different compositions at 1 and 28 days. Two distinct lipidic layers, with the outermost layer containing nucleic acid bases and fatty acids, have also been identified at the interface between the implanted silicone catheter and the host tissue, providing molecular insight into the foreign body reaction at 28 days. This nucleic acid rich lipid interface forms the bridge that links the biomaterials and the cellular layers that surround the biomaterials. It was shown that the elevated levels of urate, FA 14:0, and FA 16:0 coupled with the presence of icosatetraenoic acid at the implant tissue interface provide an indicator for increased inflammatory response at the implantation site. Such findings were corroborated by the observation of a highly inflamed subcutaneous tissue at 28 days, which displayed the presence of collagen as shown via histological analysis. Overall, these findings show that the cryo-GCIB/OrbiSIMS analytical workflow provides us with the necessary tools to deconvolute and understand the complex biointerface formed on a silicone implant during an FBR response. Such methodology could be translatable to novel immune instructive surfaces, enabling us to gain insights into the performance of biomaterials in vivo. Indeed, the expansion of this concept may provide an impetus to pave the way for advancements in developing novel immune-instructive materials with an augmented functionality and biocompatibility.
Supplementary Material
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Zare M.Ghomi E. R.Venkatraman P. D.Ramakrishna S.Silicone-Based Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications: Antimicrobial Strategies and 3D Printing Technologies J. Appl. Polym. Sci.20211385096910.1002/app.50969 · doi ↗
- 2Doloff J. C.Veiseh O.de Mezerville R.Sforza M.Perry T. A.Haupt J.Jamiel M.Chambers C.Nash A.Aghlara-Fotovat S.Stelzel J. L.Bauer S. J.Neshat S. Y.Hancock J.Romero N. A.Hidalgo Y. E.Leiva I. M.Munhoz A. M.Bayat A.Kinney B. M.Hodges H. C.Miranda R. N.Clemens M. W.Langer R.The Surface Topography of Silicone Breast Implants Mediates the Foreign Body Response in Mice, Rabbits and Humans Nat. Biomed. Eng.20215101115113010.1038/s 41551-021-00739-434155355 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Carnicer-Lombarte A.Chen S. T.Malliaras G. G.Barone D. G.Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 20219 n/a 10.3389/fbioe.2021.622524 PMC 808183133937212 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Anderson J. M.Rodriguez A.Chang D. T.Foreign Body Reaction to Biomaterials Semin. Immunol.20082028610010.1016/j.smim.2007.11.00418162407 PMC 2327202 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Yong L. X.Sefton J.Vallières C.Rance G. A.Hill J.Cuzzucoli Crucitti V.Dundas A. A.Rose F. R. A. J.Alexander M. R.Wildman R.He Y.Avery S. V.Irvine D. J.Fungal Attachment-Resistant Polymers for the Additive Manufacture of Medical Devices ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024165450810.1021/acsami.4c 0483339349401 PMC 11472319 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Mukherjee S.Kim B.Cheng L. Y.Doerfert M. D.Li J.Hernandez A.Liang L.Jarvis M. I.Rios P. D.Ghani S.Joshi I.Isa D.Ray T.Terlier T.Fell C.Song P.Miranda R. N.Oberholzer J.Zhang D. Y.Veiseh O.Screening Hydrogels for Antifibrotic Properties by Implanting Cellularly Barcoded Alginates in Mice and a Non-Human Primate Nat. Biomed. Eng.20237786788610.1038/s 41551-023-01016-237106151 PMC 10593184 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Schreib C. C.Jarvis M. I.Terlier T.Goell J.Mukherjee S.Doerfert M. D.Wilson T. A.Beauregard M.Martins K. N.Lee J.Sanchez Solis L. D.Vazquez E.Oberli M. A.Hanak B. W.Diehl M.Hilton I.Veiseh O.Lipid Deposition Profiles Influence Foreign Body Responses Adv. Mater.20233521220570910.1002/adma.202205709 PMC 1030959336871193 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Passarelli M. K.Pirkl A.Moellers R.Grinfeld D.Kollmer F.Havelund R.Newman C. F.Marshall P. S.Arlinghaus H.Alexander M. R.West A.Horning S.Niehuis E.Makarov A.Dollery C. T.Gilmore I. S.The 3D Orbi SIMSLabel-Free Metabolic Imaging with Subcellular Lateral Resolution and High Mass-Resolving Power Nat. Methods 20171412117510.1038/nmeth.450429131162 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
