# Pyrolysis behavior of Sterculia guttata shell biomass: kinetics, thermodynamics, techno-economic and life cycle assessment of industrial-scale biochar production

**Authors:** Subramaniyasharma Sivaraman, Rangabhashiyam Selvasembian

PMC · DOI: 10.1039/d5ra09614f · RSC Advances · 2026-02-23

## TL;DR

This study explores using Sterculia guttata shells for bioenergy through pyrolysis, showing it is both economically viable and sustainable.

## Contribution

The study provides a comprehensive assessment of SGSW for industrial-scale biochar production, including techno-economic and life cycle analyses.

## Key findings

- SGSW pyrolysis requires moderate energy with activation energies between 50.21–71.86 kJ mol−1.
- Techno-economic analysis shows a 38.69% ROI and 2.7-year payback period for industrial-scale biochar production.
- Life cycle assessment indicates SGSW biochar sustainability depends on allocation methods, with GWP values between 0.88 to 1.27 kg CO2 eq per kg.

## Abstract

To address the growing demand for renewable energy sources in developing economies, this study evaluates the pyrolysis behavior, kinetics, and thermodynamic characteristics of Sterculia guttata shell waste (SGSW) to determine its suitability as a bioenergy feedstock. Kinetic parameters were calculated using model-free isoconversional techniques. The average activation energies (Ea) acquired varied between 50.21–71.86 kJ mol−1, suggesting moderate energy needs for pyrolysis. Reflecting the complicated response mechanism, the pre-exponential factor (A) varied from 106 to 107 min−1. Thermodynamic study produced enthalpy changes (ΔH) between 22.9 and 54.8 kJ mol−1 and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) values of 152.1 to 156.8 kJ mol−1, demonstrating the endothermic and feasible nature of the process. The study further establishes industrial viability through a techno-economic analysis, which projects a Return on Investment (ROI) of 38.69%, a payback period of 2.7 years, and a Net Present Value (NPV) of USD 6.67 million. The life cycle assessment results underscore that SGSW biochar sustainability is sensitive to allocation methods, with GWP values ranging from 0.88 to 1.27 kg CO2 eq per kg of biochar. These findings underscore the scientific value of SGSW by validating it as a low-energy, economically robust candidate for scalable thermochemical conversion and sustainable bioenergy production.

This study evaluates Sterculia guttata shell waste (SGSW) as a sustainable bioenergy feedstock using pyrolysis kinetics and thermodynamic analysis. Techno-economic and life cycle analyses support viability and sustainability at scale.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CLTA (clathrin light chain A) [NCBI Gene 1211] {aka LCA}
- **Diseases:** HS (MESH:C567159), Carcinogenic Toxicity (MESH:D064420), weight loss (MESH:D015431)
- **Chemicals:** C (MESH:D002244), ketones (MESH:D007659), methane (MESH:D008697), N2 (MESH:D009584), CO (MESH:D002248), acids (MESH:D000143), aldehydes (MESH:D000447), hemicellulose (MESH:C007916), hydrochloric acid (MESH:D006851), DTG (MESH:C562325), alumina (MESH:D000537), water (MESH:D014867), oil (MESH:D009821), Acetone (MESH:D000096), 2,3-butanediol (MESH:C026978), chromium (MESH:D002857), 1,4-DCB (-), heavy metals (MESH:D019216), SO2 (MESH:D013458), alcohols (MESH:D000438), hydrogen (MESH:D006859), cellulose (MESH:D002482), arsenic (MESH:D001151), PM (MESH:D011399), bio-oil (MESH:C000613328), Biochar (MESH:C540010), CO2 (MESH:D002245), Lignin (MESH:D008031)
- **Species:** Phoenix dactylifera (date palm, species) [taxon 42345], Musa balbisiana (Balbis banana, species) [taxon 52838], Arachis hypogaea (goober, species) [taxon 3818], Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea, species) [taxon 3821], Prunus armeniaca (apricot, species) [taxon 36596], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Manihot esculenta (cassava, species) [taxon 3983], Parthenium hysterophorus (species) [taxon 183063]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926749/full.md

## Figures

10 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926749/full.md

## References

162 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926749/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926749