# Optimizing insecticide deployment strategies to delay quantitative resistance in mosquito populations

**Authors:** Sylvère Kezeta-Bondja, Charles S. Wondji, Ramsès Djidjou-Demasse

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00285-026-02343-z · Journal of Mathematical Biology · 2026-02-23

## TL;DR

This paper uses a mathematical model to determine the best ways to use insecticides to slow the development of resistance in mosquitoes.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel mathematical model to optimize insecticide deployment strategies based on mutational variance and resistance dynamics.

## Key findings

- High mutational variance favors full coverage with the most effective insecticide.
- Low mutational variance requires temporary coverage reduction and depends on initial exposure rates.
- Sequential deployment is better than simultaneous use when the first insecticide is ineffective.

## Abstract

The large-scale use of insecticides remains a cornerstone of malaria vector control, but its long-term effectiveness is undermined by the evolution of quantitative insecticide resistance (qIR) in mosquito populations. We develop and analyze a mathematical model to identify optimal deployment strategies for two insecticides that differ only in their relative efficacy against target mosquito populations. Resistance is represented as a continuous phenotypic trait influencing mosquito fecundity and mortality, and the model accounts for successive deployment periods. Our results show that when mutational variance is high, the optimal strategy is to deploy the most effective insecticide at full coverage, regardless of its relative efficacy or pre-deployment exposure history. By contrast, when mutational variance is low, optimal deployment requires a transient reduction in coverage during early periods, with a threshold effect driven by both relative efficacy and initial exposure rates. Crucially, we find that, under the hypothesis that the first insecticide is ineffective against mosquitoes, simultaneous use of both insecticides is rarely optimal. Instead, sequential deployment–using one insecticide until resistance reaches a critical threshold, followed by optimal use of the second–delays resistance evolution and improves long-term control. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for adaptive qIR management strategies aimed at prolonging the effectiveness of insecticides in malaria vector control.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00285-026-02343-z.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** malaria (MONDO:0005136)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** MOS (MOS proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) [NCBI Gene 4342] {aka MSV, OZEMA20}
- **Diseases:** IR (MESH:D060467), Malaria (MESH:D008288), VBDs (MESH:D000079426), deaths (MESH:D003643)
- **Chemicals:** pyrethroid (MESH:D011722), Volterra (-)
- **Species:** Aeromonas sp. FM (species) [taxon 866725]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926253/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926253/full.md

## References

2 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926253/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926253