# Dosimetric Discrepancy Between Whole-Lung and Lobe-Specific Metrics in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Its Implications for Regional Dose Assessment

**Authors:** Hideharu Miura, Shuichi Ozawa, Masahiro Kenjo

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.102180 · Cureus · 2026-01-23

## TL;DR

This study shows that whole-lung radiation dose metrics in lung cancer treatment can miss high-dose areas in specific lobes, suggesting the need for more detailed lobe-specific assessments.

## Contribution

The study introduces lobe-specific dosimetry to reveal discrepancies in conventional whole-lung radiation dose metrics in lung SBRT.

## Key findings

- Tumor-bearing lobes received significantly higher radiation doses than whole-lung metrics indicated.
- Whole-lung metrics correlated more with non-tumor-bearing lobe doses than with tumor-bearing lobe doses.
- Volumetric averaging in whole-lung metrics can obscure high-dose regions in specific lobes.

## Abstract

Introduction: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a standard treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Radiation pneumonitis is a major dose-limiting toxicity, typically assessed using whole-lung metrics like mean lung dose (MLD) and relative lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20Gy). However, the high-dose conformality of SBRT may lead to a volumetric averaging effect, where whole-lung metrics obscure intense local doses within a small fraction of the lung. This study quantitatively evaluates the discrepancy between conventional whole-lung metrics and lobe-specific dosimetry.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 10 patients with T1-T2N0M0 NSCLC treated with SBRT (42 Gy in four fractions). Lung lobes - right upper, middle, lower, and left upper and lower - were automatically segmented using deep learning-based software (OncoStudio; Oncosoft, Seoul, South Korea) and manually refined. The lobe containing the tumor was defined as the tumor-bearing lobe (TBL), while others were defined as non-tumor-bearing lobes (NTBLs). Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters (MLD, relative lung volume receiving at least 5 Gy (V5Gy), relative lung volume receiving at least 10 Gy (V10Gy), and V20Gy) were compared for the whole lungs, TBL, and NTBLs using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient assessed the relationship between whole-lung and lobe-specific metrics.

Results: TBL-specific dose intensities were markedly higher than whole-lung metrics: median V20Gy was 6.3% for TBL versus 1.5% for the whole lungs, and median MLD was 4.61 Gy for TBL versus 1.68 Gy for the whole lungs. Statistically significant differences were observed across all parameters (p < 0.01). Correlation analysis showed that statistically significant correlations were not reached between whole-lung metrics and TBL values, including for V20Gy (p = 0.074). Instead, these whole-lung metrics exhibited strong and consistent correlations with the dose distributed across the combined NTBLs.

Conclusion: Conventional whole-lung metrics substantially underestimate the radiation concentration within the TBL due to volumetric dilution. While high-dose whole-lung parameters like V20Gy reflect local lobar intensity, low-dose metrics primarily serve as surrogates for NTBL exposure. Lobe-based analysis provides a refined, anatomically grounded framework for characterizing regional dose distributions in lung SBRT and reveals spatial dose patterns that are obscured when using conventional whole-lung assessment alone.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** non-small cell lung cancer (MONDO:0005233), radiation pneumonitis (MONDO:0043919)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420), lung tumors (MESH:D008175), Radiation pneumonitis (MESH:D017564), lung damage (MESH:D008171), Cancer (MESH:D009369), RML (MESH:D020244), NSCLC (MESH:D002289)
- **Chemicals:** E2017-0947-02 (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926229/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926229/full.md

## References

23 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926229/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12926229