From prioritization to implementation: updating the PARC WP5 project portfolio through the second prioritization round
Celia Garcia Arenas, Kiara Aiello Holden, Terje Svingen, Dries Knapen, Saadia Kerdine-Römer, Birgitte Lindeman, Nicola M. Smith, Ludovic Le Hegarat, Tamara Vanhaecke, Gilles Rivière, Philip Marx-Stoelting

TL;DR
This paper outlines how the PARC partnership updated its project portfolio to address regulatory challenges in chemical risk assessment using new methodologies.
Contribution
The paper introduces four new projects in the PARC WP5 portfolio aimed at addressing specific regulatory gaps and accelerating the adoption of new approach methodologies.
Findings
The updated WP5 project portfolio includes initiatives on developmental and reproductive toxicity.
A transversal project focuses on accelerating the regulatory uptake of new methodologies.
The new projects align with the evolving regulatory needs identified by the European Chemicals Agency.
Abstract
The Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC) represents a joint effort among risk assessors, regulatory authorities, and the scientific community to advance the implementation of next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) in line with the objectives of the EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. Addressing the challenges faced by the national and European regulators by integrating data generated through innovative methodologies is central to achieving this goal. Following an initial phase of the partnership, in which projects were defined based on a first prioritization of methodologies, a second prioritization round was conducted with input from the Governing Board representatives of all participating entities. This second process also considered the Key Areas of Regulatory Challenge introduced by the European Chemicals Agency in 2023, ensuring that the evolving…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals · Immunotoxicology and immune responses · Animal testing and alternatives
