Short-Term Outcomes of Digitalis Silicone Implant for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis and a Proposed Functional-Radiological Classification
Sergi Barrera-Ochoa, Melissa Bonilla-Chaperon, Leobardo Alexis Alvarez-Villalobos, Neri Alejandro Alvarez-Villalobos, Gerardo Mendez-Sanchez

TL;DR
A new silicone implant improves joint function and pain in patients with advanced finger osteoarthritis, with a new classification system proposed for severity assessment.
Contribution
A novel silicone implant and a new functional-radiological classification system for PIPJ osteoarthritis are introduced and evaluated.
Findings
The BRM Digitalis implant significantly improved motion, pain, and strength in patients with PIPJ osteoarthritis.
Grade 4 patients in the PIP-Kellgren classification showed greater functional improvements compared to grade 3 patients.
No implant fractures or infections were observed, and patient satisfaction was high.
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of a novel silicone implant (BRM Digitalis) for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) osteoarthritis and to propose a novel functional-radiological classification system (PIP-Kellgren) adapted from the Kellgren-Lawrence scale. This retrospective longitudinal study included 33 patients with symptomatic PIPJ osteoarthritis treated using the BRM Digitalis silicone implant, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Subjective outcomes were assessed using the QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) questionnaire, visual analog scale for pain, and a seven-item Likert satisfaction score. Objective clinical and radiographic data were collected by measuring range of motion (ROM), extension lag, grip and pinch strength, pulp-to-palm distance, and evaluating implant position and integrity on final radiographs. Statistically…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Foot and Ankle Surgery · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
