A systematic review and meta-analysis of the morbidity of the donor-site of flaps harvested based on the first intermetatarsal artery
Virginia E Knutson, Giorgio Pajardi, Giulia Del Vecchio, Macarena Vizcay, Stephanie Hili, Francesco Zanchetta, Luigi Troisi

TL;DR
This study reviews and analyzes the complications at the donor site after foot flap surgery, finding low but variable rates of objective and subjective issues.
Contribution
The paper provides the first systematic review and meta-analysis on donor-site morbidity for foot-based free flaps in reconstructive surgery.
Findings
Objective donor-site morbidity occurred in 2.99% of cases, with wound dehiscence and delayed healing being most common.
Subjective donor-site morbidity occurred in 3.32% of cases, with daily life disturbance and pain being most frequent.
The study found substantial heterogeneity across studies, limiting the strength of the conclusions.
Abstract
Free tissue flaps from the foot have become an increasingly reliable tool in modern reconstructive surgery; however, the field lacks an empirical analysis focused on donor-site morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the incidence of donor-site morbidity following dorsalis pedis and free toe flap harvest. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov was performed on March 3, 2025, to identify eligible studies involving adults who underwent free flap harvest from the toes or dorsum of the foot and reported postoperative donor-site morbidity outcomes. Eligible designs included case series (≥5 patients), observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and controlled clinical trials published in English. Letters, reviews, editorials,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques · Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques · Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
