Reevaluating carbon storage and emissions in California’s harvested wood products: implications for alternative waste parameters
Taylor K. Lucey, Meghan Graham MacLean, Nadia A. Tase

TL;DR
This study improves estimates of carbon storage and emissions from wood and paper products in California landfills by refining waste parameters.
Contribution
The research introduces updated product-level decay and storage parameters to reduce uncertainty in carbon accounting for landfilled wood and paper.
Findings
Updating waste parameters increased cumulative carbon storage in landfills by 11.77 MMT CO2Eq and reduced emissions by 11.18 MMT CO2Eq from 1953 to 2020.
Wood products stored significantly more carbon (164.07 MMT CO2Eq) compared to paper (31.41 MMT CO2Eq) over the same period.
Product-level analysis revealed similar annual carbon emissions for wood and paper products, but higher annual storage for wood.
Abstract
Harvested wood and paper products can store large amounts of carbon long-term but also contribute to carbon emissions once discarded. Currently, several tools are used for inventory and reporting carbon in wood and paper products in the U.S. Carbon in wood and paper is tracked from initial manufacturing, through its lifetime, and final fate (e.g., dumps, landfills, incinerated, or recycled). Once discarded into landfills, a portion of wood and paper is assumed permanently stored; however, carbon storage of specific products can vary widely which influences carbon storage and emissions estimates. Using historical California harvest data and state-level inventory model, HWP-C vR, this research built model capacity for expanding and refining waste parameters, such as product-level decay half-lives and proportions of permanent carbon storage to reduce waste parameter uncertainty. By…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability · Municipal Solid Waste Management · Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
